$Other / Other Cat

Groups of wallets that keep buying the same coins: launch crews (they buy launch blocks together) and holder guilds (they sit among the top holders of the same coins). Only groups with 2+ wallets in this coin.

SOL the dev and the launch-block wallets took out of the coin in its first 24 hours (sales minus buys, plus liquidity taken back out of a pool minus liquidity put in), grouped by how they're linked.

Still inside the first 24 hours: updated every 15 minutes. Counts trades from each wallet's own token account for this coin (up to 25 each). Tokens passed to another wallet and sold there only count if that wallet is in the set. Liquidity added to or taken out of a pool is counted separately from buys and sells. Dollars at today's SOL price ($91). Measured 1 h ago.

How the launch buyers and top holders traded this coin (which app, which fee settings) and where the top holders' money came from. Read from each wallet's first trade of this coin.

Trading apps

Where the top holders' money came from

Apps are named only when the trade itself shows it (an account or program carrying the app's name, e.g. GMGN, Axiom, Jupiter); otherwise we show the wallet the trade paid a 0.1–3% fee to, or the program it went through. Priority fee = transaction fee minus the 5,000-lamport base per signature; a fee seen in 20+ other coins is marked as a common default. Exchanges are named only from our label book; a funder with 1,000 transactions in under a day is a busy hot wallet (exchange, swap service or bot). Facts, not part of the light. Measured 1 h ago.

The dev, the wallets that bought the launch block, and holders the dev funded: how they're connected and how their earlier coins did. The launch map below draws the connections.

Creator wallet 4TrQ6PDX2xxP45bDFHXgn8Evegv8PxmF2pv7zhVuKxhF (from GeckoTerminal). 1 other coin from it in our records: Open the wallet ›

1 red

$AMD A Meme DogVampThe dev holds none now, nothing against it on record; the same X post is linked by 7 other coins we've seen; t 35 $22.2Kat scan 1h ago

Who each of the biggest holders is to this launch, from the launch block, first funding, insider flags, known groups and each wallet's first trade.

Source RugCheck, read 2 h ago.

The 20 biggest holders (bigger bubble = bigger share). Grey: pools and known services. Pink: wallets RugCheck flags as insiders. Same colour with a line to an outer dot: first funded by the same wallet. Linked holders hold 0.83%. Liquidity locked: 0.0%.

Holders, insider flags, labels and liquidity locks: RugCheck. Shared funders: our own read of each wallet's first transaction.

What we find when we compare the coin's website, code, token, launch timing, liquidity, ticker and wallets against each other and against public address labels.

• Promises vs the chain2 of 3 promises don't hold: liquidity locked or burned (Only 0% of the pool's liquidity is locked or burned); the dev won't sell (The dev wallet holds none of the supply now) source
• Cabals in this coin1 known group of wallets is in this coin. The largest, holder guild #g649bb, has 6 of its 26 wallets here: 0.9% held at our check. 54 of the 111 coins it was in with an outcome fell 80%+ within a day. source
• Money outThe dev and 0 launch-block wallets put in more SOL than they took out in the first 24 hours. That includes liquidity: 203.9 SOL added to the pool, 0.0 SOL taken back out. source
• The teamThe dev and 0 early buyer/holder wallets; 1 earlier coins together, outcomes still coming in. source
• The story behind itThe coin's story is an X post by @Polymarket (verified) with 994 likes. It was posted 940 days before the coin's first pool. The post doesn't name this coin: the coin borrows its story. 6 other coins we checked use the same post. source
• Website doesn't show this token's addressThe token's address doesn't appear on its website or in the site's code. source
• AI claim, no AI calls seenThe site claims AI, but none of its pages called an AI service while we watched (it may run on its own servers). source
• On-chain claim, no wallet codeThe site claims on-chain / smart contracts, but its code has no wallet or contract calls. source
• Website age vs launchThe Internet Archive first saved the site 1664 days before the coin launched. source
• Liquidity depthPool liquidity is $0, 0.0% of the $252K market cap. Selling 1% of the supply (about $2.5K) would get roughly 100.0% less than the quoted price (estimate for a standard pool). source
• Same ticker elsewhere26 other coins trade as $Other. The biggest is Other Cat on Solana ($311K, first pool 3h ago). source
• Contract permissions (GoPlus)GoPlus finds none of the risky permissions it checks for. source
• Creator's earlier coinsThis creator launched 1 other coin we checked.
• Reused X postThe X post x.com/polymarket/status/1777043065116512568 is also listed by 6 other coins we checked: $Other, $Other, $Other, $Other…. So many coins list it that it's most likely someone else's, borrowed for the story. source
• Reused websiteThe website nexchain.ai is also listed by 26 other coins we checked: $NEX Ai, $NEX Ai, $NEX Ai, $NEX Ai…. So many coins list it that it's most likely someone else's, borrowed for the story. source

How earlier coins with the same signals did: the share that fell 80% or more within 24 hours of our check, against coins without the signal. It describes past coins; it doesn't predict this one. All signals

• Checked isn't the same as safe: these checks describe what the token allows and what the website runs, not what anyone will do.
• "Nothing found" means not visible on the public page; servers and private code are invisible to us. Not financial advice.