$fun

Solanagraduated 16d ago Website X DexScreener
MC– 24h– Vol 24h– Liq– Holders– Right now– Since scan–
Yellow light69/100

Fewer than 500 holders; 100% bought in the launch block by 4 wallets

Will it send?
Went 2x+24%
Fell 80%+48%

Of 6,813 earlier coins with a yellow light, a day after our check. History, not a prediction.

Light v12 · 11,468 coins judged · Scanned 17 Oct 2026 at $10.9K. What the light means
Is the tech real?90
  • -10Website doesn't show this token's address source
Is the dev legit?–

Can't tell yet: too little known about the dev.

Fair launch?70
  • -15100% of supply bought in the launch block by 4 wallets
  • 0Kept from green: fewer than 500 holders source
𝕏 account@onchainchef67

Not read yet: we read linked accounts within a few minutes of a check.

  • Links an X post, not an account
  • The same X account is linked by 5 other coins we've seen

Also linked by: E3XN…8Tdk, F5fW…hLU1, BBne…Vw5M, AgFD…DeD7, 49NF…qktc

Mint & freeze revokedLaunch block 100%Older coin, same ticker
Loading the chart…

    ▲ buy · ▼ sell · ● event. Markers show trades by wallets we know something about (D dev, LB launch-block buyer, C crew, K KOL, S smart money, W large trade, TG callout) and what our live watch flagged. Facts, not a verdict. Charts by TradingView.

    Money out: we found no trades of this coin from the dev's or the launch-block wallets' token accounts in its first 24 hours (bots that trade through throwaway accounts can hide from this).

    The launch block, by who paid for it

    The 4 wallets that bought in the launch block (the first two blocks, under a second) took 100.0% of the supply. Grouped by the wallet that first funded them: 0 linked groups hold 0% of it.

    On its own: 100.0%On its own: 0.0%On its own: 0.0%On its own: 0.0%
    GroupWalletsShare boughtTaken out (24 h)
    DZfs…HCW4 on its own 1100.0% +0.00 SOL · $0
    6cY2…HpPS on its own sniper 10.0% +0.00 SOL · $0
    uGWt…MqLu on its own 10.0% +0.00 SOL · $0
    GkCo…Cia2 on its own 10.0% +0.00 SOL · $0

    Grey = a wallet with no funding link to the others. Taken out = sales minus buys plus liquidity out minus in, from the money-out measurement above.

    The team

    The dev, the wallets that bought the launch block, and holders the dev funded: how they're connected and how their earlier coins did. The launch map below draws the connections.

    4Wallets in the team
    0Connected to the dev
    49%Earlier coins that fell 80%+
    27%Earlier coins that went 2x+
    6cY2…HpPS early buyer sniper 183 earlier coins: 36 fell 80%+, 20 2x+
    DZfs…HCW4 early buyer · 100.0% no earlier coins seen
    uGWt…MqLu early buyer no earlier coins seen
    GkCo…Cia2 early buyer no earlier coins seen

    Money map

    Loading who funded whom…

    Arrows show money moving (first SOL a wallet received) and coins bought or held. Facts from the chain, not a verdict about anyone.

    The launch block

    4 wallets bought 100.0% of the supply in the same block the coin was created (or the next one). Many buyers there usually means a scripted, "bundled" launch.

    DZfs…HCW4100.00%
    6cY2…HpPS0.00%
    uGWt…MqLu0.00%
    GkCo…Cia20.00%

    At a glance

    • Mint & freezeRevoked
    • Bought in the launch block100.0% by 4 wallets
    • Socialssite X

    Facts read from the chain and the coin's own pages. Checked isn't the same as safe.

    Launch map

    The creator in the middle, the wallets that bought in the launch block around it (bigger bubble = bigger share of supply), and the wallets that funded them on the outside. Buyers with the same colour were funded by the same wallet.

    Launch tape (log time from creation)

    Created Launch block 100% · 4 wallets · +0s Now +16d

    Live activity

    Connecting to the live trades…

    What we're seeing

    • Waiting for trades…

    Latest trades

    Most active wallets (in the trades we've read)

    WalletBoughtSoldNetTrades
    Waiting for trades…

    Trades from GeckoTerminal's public feed, refreshed every few seconds while this page is open. Wallet ages and funders: our own reads of each wallet's first transaction. Flags describe what happened, not why.

    100% of supply went to 4 launch-block wallets; mint and freeze revoked.

    • Website doesn't show this token's addressThe token's address doesn't appear on its website or in the site's code; the site shows other addresses (4zMM…ncDU, EPjF…Dt1v, So11…1112).
    • Same ticker elsewhere22 other coins trade as $fun. The biggest is FunPay on polygon ($183M, first pool 4mo ago). It is older and bigger than this one, so check you have the address you meant.

    Cross-checks

    What we find when we compare the coin's website, code, token, launch timing, liquidity, ticker and wallets against each other and against public address labels.

    • The teamThe dev and 3 early buyer/holder wallets; their 73 earlier coins with an outcome: 36 fell 80%+, 20 went 2x+ within a day. source
    • The story behind itThe coin's story is an X post by @OnChainChef67 (verified) with 18 likes. The post names this coin. 3 other coins we checked use the same post. source
    • Website doesn't show this token's addressThe token's address doesn't appear on its website or in the site's code; the site shows other addresses (4zMM…ncDU, EPjF…Dt1v, So11…1112). source
    • Website age vs launchThe Internet Archive first saved the site 1082 days before the coin launched. source
    • Same ticker elsewhere22 other coins trade as $fun. The biggest is FunPay on polygon ($183M, first pool 4mo ago). It is older and bigger than this one, so check you have the address you meant. source
    • Contract permissions (GoPlus)GoPlus finds none of the risky permissions it checks for. source
    • Reused X postThe X post x.com/OnChainChef67/status/2111604225310384246 is also listed by 3 other coins we checked: $fun, $fun, $fun. 1 of them came earlier. source

    The token

    Mint & freeze revoked

    • Mint new tokens: locked
    • Freeze wallets: locked
    • Change name, logo and links: locked
    Full token report

    The website

    The website makes none of the tech claims we check for.

    Full website report
    The story behind it

    @OnChainChef67 verified · 18 likes · 2 replies

    https://t.co/awvw3osrU1 meaning fun paired to pump would make the most sense PUMP is the utility side while $fun is the culture/meme side. Pump + Fun. Literally the two halves of https://t.co/awvw3osrU1. Let's have some fun

    The post names this coin. 3 other coins we checked use the same post.

    Track record of these signals

    How earlier coins with the same signals did: the share that fell 80% or more within 24 hours of our check, against coins without the signal. It describes past coins; it doesn't predict this one. All signals

    Signal this coin hasFell 80%+ with itWithout itCoins
    20%+ bought in the launch block50%53%904
    • Checked isn't the same as safe: these checks describe what the token allows and what the website runs, not what anyone will do.
    • "Nothing found" means not visible on the public page; servers and private code are invisible to us. Not financial advice.