$UP / Useless Pepe

Groups of wallets that keep buying the same coins: launch crews (they buy launch blocks together) and holder guilds (they sit among the top holders of the same coins). Only groups with 2+ wallets in this coin.

SOL the dev and the launch-block wallets took out of the coin in its first 24 hours (sales minus buys, plus liquidity taken back out of a pool minus liquidity put in), grouped by how they're linked.

Counts trades from each wallet's own token account for this coin (up to 25 each). Tokens passed to another wallet and sold there only count if that wallet is in the set. Liquidity added to or taken out of a pool is counted separately from buys and sells. Dollars at today's SOL price ($101). Measured 29 Oct 2026.

The dev, the wallets that bought the launch block, and holders the dev funded: how they're connected and how their earlier coins did. The launch map below draws the connections.

Creator wallet BJBUvGS3YW6wcJXWk4FmH7oeVn1CiBLYiHSCqdRxUpTw (from GeckoTerminal). No other coins from this wallet in our records yet. Open the wallet ›

Who each of the biggest holders is to this launch, from the launch block, first funding, insider flags, known groups and each wallet's first trade.

Source RugCheck, read 28 Oct 2026.

The 20 biggest holders (bigger bubble = bigger share). Grey: pools and known services. Pink: wallets RugCheck flags as insiders. Same colour with a line to an outer dot: first funded by the same wallet. Liquidity locked: 0.0%.

Holders, insider flags, labels and liquidity locks: RugCheck. Shared funders: our own read of each wallet's first transaction.

What we find when we compare the coin's website, code, token, launch timing, liquidity, ticker and wallets against each other and against public address labels.

• Cabals in this coin1 known group of wallets is in this coin. The largest, holder guild #g2431d, has 5 of its 6 wallets here: 1.34% held at our check. 2 of the 7 coins it was in with an outcome fell 80%+ within a day. source
• Money out$4,217 (41.7 SOL) taken out in the first 24 hours by 1 of the dev and launch-block wallets, in 1 linked group. That includes liquidity: 82.0 SOL added to the pool, 123.7 SOL taken back out. source
• The teamThe dev and 0 early buyer/holder wallets. source
• The story behind itThe coin's story is an X post by @aboalialhzober with 11 likes. The post names this coin. 14 other coins we checked use the same post. source
• Website doesn't show this token's addressThe token's address doesn't appear on its website or in the site's code; the site shows other addresses (6zyP…pump, So11…1112, Toke…Q5DA). source
• On-chain features in the codeThe site's code contains wallet or contract code. source
• Website age vs launchThe Internet Archive first saved the site 51 days before the coin launched. source
• Reused X postThe X post x.com/i/status/2115381733365297443 is also listed by 14 other coins we checked: $UP, $UP, $UP, $UP…. So many coins list it that it's most likely someone else's, borrowed for the story. source
• Reused websiteThe website otcdesks.cash is also listed by 200 other coins we checked: $KINK, $A71, $Teddy, $CAPE…. So many coins list it that it's most likely someone else's, borrowed for the story. source

How earlier coins with the same signals did: the share that fell 80% or more within 24 hours of our check, against coins without the signal. It describes past coins; it doesn't predict this one. All signals

• Checked isn't the same as safe: these checks describe what the token allows and what the website runs, not what anyone will do.
• "Nothing found" means not visible on the public page; servers and private code are invisible to us. Not financial advice.