$RAM / Ram Altman
Trading for 12h; 20% of supply went to 2 launch-block wallets; mint and freeze revoked; 1,102 holders, top 10 hold 80%.
▲ buy · ▼ sell · ● event. Markers show trades by wallets we know something about (D dev, LB launch-block buyer, C crew, K KOL, S smart money, W large trade, TG callout) and what our live watch flagged. Facts, not a verdict. Charts by TradingView.
Holder concentration
Top holders mapped by share
holderthe devinsiderother colours: same funderpool or service
Deepest pools
Top 1 by liquidity
Bar = share of all liquidity across the coin's pools. Pools from DexScreener.
How we scanned the website
otcdesks.cash
- 1Opened otcdesks.cash in our sandboxed browser80 requests in 17.7s
- 2Read its code 36 scriptsReact, Next.js, WalletConnect / Reown, Solana web3 / wallet adapter
- 3Talks to 1 own host + 2 outside servicesFirebase / Google Cloud, Helius
- 4Wallet code connects a walletWalletConnect / Reown, Solana web3 / wallet adapter · doesn't show this coin's address
- 5Tech claims 1 of 1 backed by its own code ✓ Wallet connection
Over time
Liquidity, holders and market cap
Recording started: we read this coin every 10 minutes from now on, and the charts fill in over the next hour.
Money out (what the dev and launch-block wallets sold minus bought in the first 24 hours) is being measured: this updates by itself in a minute.
Footprints (trading apps, fee settings and where the top holders' money came from) are being measured: this updates by itself in a minute.
The launch block, by who paid for it
The 2 wallets that bought in the launch block (the first two blocks, under a second) took 20.05% of the supply. Grouped by the wallet that first funded them: 0 linked groups hold 0% of it.
| Group | Wallets | Share bought | Taken out (24 h) |
|---|---|---|---|
| ELJY…f8zZ on its own | 1 | 20.05% | measuring |
| 7oDF…kQ2A on its own sniper | 1 | 0.0% | measuring |
Grey = a wallet with no funding link to the others. Taken out = sales minus buys plus liquidity out minus in, from the money-out measurement above.
The team
The dev, the wallets that bought the launch block, and holders the dev funded: how they're connected and how their earlier coins did. The launch map below draws the connections.
| 7oDF…kQ2A | early buyer sniper | 756 earlier coins: 1 fell 80%+, 0 2x+ | |
| ELJY…f8zZ | early buyer · 20.1% | no earlier coins seen |
Money map
Loading who funded whom…Arrows show money moving (the first money a wallet received) and coins bought or held. Facts from the chain, not a verdict about anyone.
Repeat launch buyers
1 of the wallets that bought this coin's launch block also bought the launch block of other coins we checked. Sniper bots and launch groups both look like this.
| 7oDF…kQ2A | 756 other launches | 11jJ… 12QM… 141n… 14QG… |
At a glance
- Mint & freezeRevoked
- Bought in the launch block20.1% by 2 wallets
- Held by top 1080%
- Socialssite X
Facts read from the chain and the coin's own pages. Checked isn't the same as safe.
Top holders
Who each of the biggest holders is to this launch, from the launch block, first funding, insider flags, known groups and each wallet's first trade.
Source RugCheck, read 12 h ago.
| # | Wallet | Holds | What we know |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | FhVo…HLuM | 79.95% | nothing stands out |
| 2 | Pump Fun AMM | 19.56% | |
| 3 | B8RG…iakK | 0.00% | nothing stands out |
| 4 | HhAF…6iSY | 0.00% | busy wallet |
| 5 | 2ofD…ar3j | 0.00% | busy wallet |
| 6 | 88oY…qHtn | 0.00% | busy wallet |
| 7 | 793p…6Ph1 | 0.00% | busy wallet |
| 8 | 6txr…S5ff | 0.00% | busy wallet |
| 9 | FBTw…ZWjC | 0.00% | busy wallet |
| 10 | 3fjY…hxcC | 0.00% | busy wallet |
| 11 | A53C…Acmc | 0.00% | busy wallet |
| 12 | Df6z…XPc9 | 0.00% | busy wallet |
| 13 | 5gxW…CN3L | 0.00% | nothing stands out |
| 14 | B1zE…M552 | 0.00% | nothing stands out |
| 15 | HqmF…ZQgB | 0.00% | nothing stands out |
| 16 | 5imp…Vst4 | 0.00% | nothing stands out |
| 17 | HdNt…87Fv | 0.00% | nothing stands out |
| 18 | 6uzJ…S9Cx | 0.00% | nothing stands out |
| 19 | FAdm…GvjY | 0.00% | nothing stands out |
| 20 | FFkW…4vXm | 0.00% | nothing stands out |
Holder map
The 20 biggest holders (bigger bubble = bigger share). Grey: pools and known services. Pink: wallets RugCheck flags as insiders. Same colour with a line to an outer dot: first funded by the same wallet. Liquidity locked: 0.0%.
Holders, insider flags, labels and liquidity locks: RugCheck. Shared funders: our own read of each wallet's first transaction.
Launch map
The creator in the middle, the wallets that bought in the launch block around it (bigger bubble = bigger share of supply), and the wallets that funded them on the outside. Buyers with the same colour were funded by the same wallet.
Launch tape (log time from creation)
Live activity
What we're seeing
- Waiting for trades…
Latest trades
Most active wallets (in the trades we've read)
| Wallet | Bought | Sold | Net | Trades | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Waiting for trades… | |||||
Trades from GeckoTerminal's public feed, refreshed every few seconds while this page is open. Wallet ages and funders: our own reads of each wallet's first transaction. Flags describe what happened, not why.
Trading for 12h; 20% of supply went to 2 launch-block wallets; mint and freeze revoked; 1,102 holders, top 10 hold 80%.
- Website doesn't show this token's addressThe token's address doesn't appear on its website or in the site's code; the site shows other addresses (6zyP…pump, So11…1112, Toke…Q5DA).
- Liquidity depthPool liquidity is $0, 0.0% of the $99.3K market cap. Selling 1% of the supply (about $993) would get roughly 100.0% less than the quoted price (estimate for a standard pool).
- Same ticker elsewhere23 other coins trade as $RAM. The biggest is Ramses on Robinhood Chain ($3.0M, first pool 2mo ago). It is older and bigger than this one, so check you have the address you meant.
Cross-checks
What we find when we compare the coin's website, code, token, launch timing, liquidity, ticker and wallets against each other and against public address labels.
- The teamThe dev and 1 early buyer/holder wallet; 756 earlier coins together, outcomes still coming in. source
- Website doesn't show this token's addressThe token's address doesn't appear on its website or in the site's code; the site shows other addresses (6zyP…pump, So11…1112, Toke…Q5DA). source
- On-chain features in the codeThe site's code contains wallet or contract code. source
- Website age vs launchThe Internet Archive first saved the site 58 days before the coin launched. source
- Liquidity depthPool liquidity is $0, 0.0% of the $99.3K market cap. Selling 1% of the supply (about $993) would get roughly 100.0% less than the quoted price (estimate for a standard pool). source
- Same ticker elsewhere23 other coins trade as $RAM. The biggest is Ramses on Robinhood Chain ($3.0M, first pool 2mo ago). It is older and bigger than this one, so check you have the address you meant. source
- Reused websiteThe website otcdesks.cash is also listed by 200 other coins we checked: $KINK, $A71, $Teddy ×3, $CAPE…. So many coins list it that it's most likely someone else's, borrowed for the story. source
The token
Mint & freeze revoked
- Mint new tokens: locked
- Freeze wallets: locked
- Change name, logo and links: locked
Track record of these signals
How earlier coins with the same signals did: the share that fell 80% or more within 24 hours of our check, against coins without the signal. It describes past coins; it doesn't predict this one. All signals
| Signal this coin has | Fell 80%+ with it | Without it | Coins |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20%+ bought in the launch block | 82% | 60% | 549 |
| Top 10 hold 50%+ | 78% | 55% | 2891 |
| Launch buyers that buy many launches | 67% | 61% | 889 |
| Liquidity not locked | 81% | 59% | 1020 |
- Checked isn't the same as safe: these checks describe what the token allows and what the website runs, not what anyone will do.
- "Nothing found" means not visible on the public page; servers and private code are invisible to us. Not financial advice.