$Blind

Groups of wallets that keep buying the same coins: launch crews (they buy launch blocks together) and holder guilds (they sit among the top holders of the same coins). Only groups with 2+ wallets in this coin.

The 4 wallets that bought in the launch block (the first two blocks, under a second) took 42.65% of the supply. Grouped by the wallet that first funded them: 1 linked group holds 19.0% of it.

Grey = a wallet with no funding link to the others. Taken out = sales minus buys plus liquidity out minus in, from the money-out measurement above.

The dev, the wallets that bought the launch block, and holders the dev funded: how they're connected and how their earlier coins did. The launch map below draws the connections.

2 of the wallets that bought this coin's launch block also bought the launch block of other coins we checked. Sniper bots and launch groups both look like this.

Creator wallet EvzRnHKVbuM5oeP1SmVnXMEiu9yDzAjJFowSFuSz3TJD (from GeckoTerminal). 1 other coin from it in our records: Open the wallet ›

1 red

$EVE EvepadNarrativeDev wallet is less than a day old; only 25% of the supply in the pool; the same X post is linked by 5 other co 35 5d ago

Who each of the biggest holders is to this launch, from the launch block, first funding, insider flags, known groups and each wallet's first trade.

Source RugCheck, read 10 Nov 2026.

The 20 biggest holders (bigger bubble = bigger share). Grey: pools and known services. Pink: wallets RugCheck flags as insiders. Same colour with a line to an outer dot: first funded by the same wallet. Liquidity locked: 100%.

Holders, insider flags, labels and liquidity locks: RugCheck. Shared funders: our own read of each wallet's first transaction.

The creator in the middle, the wallets that bought in the launch block around it (bigger bubble = bigger share of supply), and the wallets that funded them on the outside. Buyers with the same colour were funded by the same wallet.

What we find when we compare the coin's website, code, token, launch timing, liquidity, ticker and wallets against each other and against public address labels.

• Cabals in this coin1 known group of wallets is in this coin. The largest, holder guild #g0472c, has 3 of its 4 wallets here: 4.52% held at our check. source
• The teamThe dev and 3 early buyer/holder wallets; their 5 earlier coins with an outcome: 4 fell 80%+, 0 went 2x+ within a day. source
• The story behind itThe coin's story is an X post by @useblindxyz (verified) with 11 likes. It was posted 11 min before the coin's first pool. The post doesn't name this coin: the coin borrows its story. source
• Website shows this token's addressThe token's address appears on its website or in the site's code. source
• Website age vs launchThe Internet Archive had no saved copy of the site (asked 3 h ago): it is probably as new as the coin.
• Liquidity depthPool liquidity is $2.6K, 195.8% of the $1.3K market cap. Selling 1% of the supply (about $13) would get roughly 1.0% less than the quoted price (estimate for a standard pool). source
• Same ticker elsewhere5 other coins trade as $Blind. None of them has real liquidity and trading behind its price. source
• Creator's earlier coinsThis creator launched 1 other coin we checked.
• Known address: creator's first funderThe creator's first funder 8DfH…m8hU is Binance (proof-of-reserves wallet). Source: binance-por. source

How earlier coins with the same signals did: the share that fell 80% or more within 24 hours of our check, against coins without the signal. It describes past coins; it doesn't predict this one. All signals

• Checked isn't the same as safe: these checks describe what the token allows and what the website runs, not what anyone will do.
• "Nothing found" means not visible on the public page; servers and private code are invisible to us. Not financial advice.