$Tampon / Tamponcoin

The 3 wallets that bought in the launch block (the first two blocks, under a second) took 29.09% of the supply. Grouped by the wallet that first funded them: 1 linked group holds 27.62% of it.

Grey = a wallet with no funding link to the others. Taken out = sales minus buys plus liquidity out minus in, from the money-out measurement above.

The dev, the wallets that bought the launch block, and holders the dev funded: how they're connected and how their earlier coins did. The launch map below draws the connections.

1 of the wallets that bought this coin's launch block also bought the launch block of other coins we checked. Sniper bots and launch groups both look like this.

Other coins in our records tied to this creator through the wallet that first funded it.

Creator wallet H53NZRyTQp9h5BY6Urmh3iP65PMikpntnS2t9sUoBzqa (from GeckoTerminal). 4 other coins from it in our records: Open the wallet ›

2 red1 of 1 judged fell 80%+ within a day

$Q4 McDonald’s QuarterNot scanned yet. – 35m ago $BurnNot scanned yet. – 35m ago $HOPEVampDev has launched 67 coins on pump.fun; copies the ticker of an older, bigger coin (a vamp) 32 11d ago $OVERTechDev not checked yet; the price ran past its pool (pool 34% of the cap); the site backs 1 of 1 tech claims with 37 -96%a day after scan 14d ago

On chain, this wallet launched 67 coins on pump.fun. We're listing them from the chain now; they show here on your next visit.

Who each of the biggest holders is to this launch, from the launch block, first funding, insider flags, known groups and each wallet's first trade.

Source RugCheck, read 33 min ago.

The 20 biggest holders (bigger bubble = bigger share). Grey: pools and known services. Pink: wallets RugCheck flags as insiders. Same colour with a line to an outer dot: first funded by the same wallet.

Holders, insider flags, labels and liquidity locks: RugCheck. Shared funders: our own read of each wallet's first transaction.

The creator in the middle, the wallets that bought in the launch block around it (bigger bubble = bigger share of supply), and the wallets that funded them on the outside. Buyers with the same colour were funded by the same wallet.

What we find when we compare the coin's website, code, token, launch timing, liquidity, ticker and wallets against each other and against public address labels.

• Creator's launchesThe creator wallet has launched 67 coins on pump.fun (counted on chain from its bonding curves); we checked 5 of them.
• The teamThe dev and 2 early buyer/holder wallets; their 244 earlier coins with an outcome: 183 fell 80%+, 6 went 2x+ within a day. source
• The story behind itThe coin's story is an X post by @mert (verified) with 37 likes. It was posted 1 min before the coin's first pool. The post doesn't name this coin: the coin borrows its story. 2 other coins we checked use the same post. source
• Same ticker elsewhere20 other coins trade as $Tampon. None of them has real liquidity and trading behind its price. source
• Linked launches16 other coins in our records connect to this creator through funding: $GG (creator funded by the same wallet), $DIUMPAD (creator funded by the same wallet), $INU (creator funded by the same wallet), $CHUD (creator funded by the same wallet)….
• Creator's earlier coinsThis creator launched 4 other coins we checked. Of the 1 with a 24 h outcome, 1 fell 80% or more within a day.
• Reused X postThe X post x.com/mert/status/2121730711279321504 is also listed by 2 other coins we checked: $Tampons, $TAMPONS. source

How earlier coins with the same signals did: the share that fell 80% or more within 24 hours of our check, against coins without the signal. It describes past coins; it doesn't predict this one. All signals

• Checked isn't the same as safe: these checks describe what the token allows and what the website runs, not what anyone will do.
• "Nothing found" means not visible on the public page; servers and private code are invisible to us. Not financial advice.