$scamsem

The 3 wallets that bought in the launch block (the first two blocks, under a second) took 19.95% of the supply. Grouped by the wallet that first funded them: 1 linked group holds 19.95% of it.

Grey = a wallet with no funding link to the others. Taken out = sales minus buys plus liquidity out minus in, from the money-out measurement above.

The dev, the wallets that bought the launch block, and holders the dev funded: how they're connected and how their earlier coins did. The launch map below draws the connections.

2 of the wallets that bought this coin's launch block also bought the launch block of other coins we checked. Sniper bots and launch groups both look like this.

Creator wallet 12WZdyDZewvauXDYMKNnAcRnYJ4qcux9ixvQrPiRofAB (from GeckoTerminal). 4 other coins from it in our records: Open the wallet ›

4 red

$PI Pink InuVampThe dev held 94% at our scan; copies the ticker of an older, bigger coin (a vamp) 36 $7.1Kat scan 2h ago $lucky dont ignore this kittenVampThe team's earlier coins: 20 of 20 fell 80%+ within a day; the pool is empty; copies the ticker of an older, b 27 $0at scan 5h ago $SmugNarrativeThe dev held none at scan, nothing on record; the pool is empty; links an X post, not an account 37 $8.3Kat scan 5h ago $PonziNarrativeDev wallet is less than a day old; the pool is empty; links an X post, not an account 35 $9.5Kat scan 10h ago

Who each of the biggest holders is to this launch, from the launch block, first funding, insider flags, known groups and each wallet's first trade.

Source RugCheck, read 10 h ago.

The 20 biggest holders (bigger bubble = bigger share). Grey: pools and known services. Pink: wallets RugCheck flags as insiders. Same colour with a line to an outer dot: first funded by the same wallet. Linked holders hold 0.24%.

Holders, insider flags, labels and liquidity locks: RugCheck. Shared funders: our own read of each wallet's first transaction.

The creator in the middle, the wallets that bought in the launch block around it (bigger bubble = bigger share of supply), and the wallets that funded them on the outside. Buyers with the same colour were funded by the same wallet.

What we find when we compare the coin's website, code, token, launch timing, liquidity, ticker and wallets against each other and against public address labels.

• The teamThe dev and 2 early buyer/holder wallets; their 136 earlier coins with an outcome: 127 fell 80%+, 1 went 2x+ within a day. source
• Same ticker elsewhere28 other coins trade as $scamsem. The biggest is scamsem on Solana ($665K, first pool 12h ago). source
• Contract permissions (GoPlus)GoPlus finds none of the risky permissions it checks for. source
• Creator's earlier coinsThis creator launched 4 other coins we checked.

How earlier coins with the same signals did: the share that fell 80% or more within 24 hours of our check, against coins without the signal. It describes past coins; it doesn't predict this one. All signals

• Checked isn't the same as safe: these checks describe what the token allows and what the website runs, not what anyone will do.
• "Nothing found" means not visible on the public page; servers and private code are invisible to us. Not financial advice.