$X

How the launch buyers and top holders traded this coin (which app, which fee settings) and where the top holders' money came from. Read from each wallet's first trade of this coin.

Trading apps

Where the top holders' money came from

Apps are named only when the trade itself shows it (an account or program carrying the app's name, e.g. GMGN, Axiom, Jupiter); otherwise we show the wallet the trade paid a 0.1–3% fee to, or the program it went through. Priority fee = transaction fee minus the 5,000-lamport base per signature; a fee seen in 20+ other coins is marked as a common default. Exchanges are named only from our label book; a funder with 1,000 transactions in under a day is a busy hot wallet (exchange, swap service or bot). Facts, not part of the light. Measured 22 h ago.

The dev, the wallets that bought the launch block, and holders the dev funded: how they're connected and how their earlier coins did. The launch map below draws the connections.

Creator wallet FiwwHe2obYsFoxprUXRWdAgHxMfKwK7ca9YB3g8bmX13 (from GeckoTerminal). 2 other coins from it in our records: Open the wallet ›

2 red1 of 1 judged fell 80%+ within a day

$AnonTechDev has launched 2,678 coins on pump.fun; website doesn't show this token's address 32 -94%a day after scan 8d ago $STARMIND Star MindTechDev has launched 2,678 coins on pump.fun; website doesn't show this token's address 27 $35.6Kat scan 20d ago

What we find when we compare the coin's website, code, token, launch timing, liquidity, ticker and wallets against each other and against public address labels.

• Creator's launchesThe creator wallet has launched 2,678 coins on pump.fun (counted on chain from its bonding curves); we checked 3 of them.
• Creator fees go to another walletThis coin's creator fees are paid to a wallet other than the one that launched it source
• Tokens handed out6 wallets holding 0.12% didn't buy: their first tokens were sent by one wallet (AgmL…zN51). source
• The teamOnly the dev wallet: no early buyer or holder wallets found with it; 2 earlier coins together, outcomes still coming in. source
• The story behind itThe coin's story is an X post by @Kirodev7 (verified) with 2 likes. It was posted 1 min before the coin's first pool. The post names this coin. 2 other coins we checked use the same post. source
• Website doesn't show this token's addressThe token's address doesn't appear on its website or in the site's code; the site shows other addresses (6zyP…pump, So11…1112, Toke…Q5DA). source
• On-chain features in the codeThe site's code contains wallet or contract code. source
• Website age vs launchThe Internet Archive first saved the site 52 days before the coin launched. source
• Liquidity depthPool liquidity is $2.2K, 107.1% of the $2.0K market cap. Selling 1% of the supply (about $20) would get roughly 1.8% less than the quoted price (estimate for a standard pool). source
• Contract permissions (GoPlus)GoPlus finds none of the risky permissions it checks for. source
• Creator's earlier coinsThis creator launched 2 other coins we checked. Of the 1 with a 24 h outcome, 1 fell 80% or more within a day.
• Reused X postThe X post x.com/Kirodev7/status/2115857232764006655 is also listed by 2 other coins we checked: $X ×2. 2 of them came earlier. source
• Reused websiteThe website otcdesks.cash is also listed by 200 other coins we checked: $KINK, $A71, $Teddy ×3, $CAPE…. So many coins list it that it's most likely someone else's, borrowed for the story. source

• Checked isn't the same as safe: these checks describe what the token allows and what the website runs, not what anyone will do.
• "Nothing found" means not visible on the public page; servers and private code are invisible to us. Not financial advice.