$WI / Woke Inutelligence

SOL the dev and the launch-block wallets took out of the coin in its first 24 hours (sales minus buys, plus liquidity taken back out of a pool minus liquidity put in), grouped by how they're linked.

Still inside the first 24 hours: this reading is from 35 min ago and is refreshed in the background. Counts trades from each wallet's own token account for this coin (up to 25 each; some wallets had more). Tokens passed to another wallet and sold there only count if that wallet is in the set. Liquidity added to or taken out of a pool is counted separately from buys and sells. Dollars at today's SOL price ($96). Measured 35 min ago.

The 5 wallets that bought in the launch block (the first two blocks, under a second) took 48.86% of the supply. Grouped by the wallet that first funded them: 0 linked groups hold 0% of it.

Grey = a wallet with no funding link to the others. Taken out = sales minus buys plus liquidity out minus in, from the money-out measurement above.

The dev, the wallets that bought the launch block, and holders the dev funded: how they're connected and how their earlier coins did. The launch map below draws the connections.

Who each of the biggest holders is to this launch, from the launch block, first funding, insider flags, known groups and each wallet's first trade.

Source RugCheck, read 7 h ago.

The 20 biggest holders (bigger bubble = bigger share). Grey: pools and known services. Pink: wallets RugCheck flags as insiders. Same colour with a line to an outer dot: first funded by the same wallet. Liquidity locked: 100%.

Holders, insider flags, labels and liquidity locks: RugCheck. Shared funders: our own read of each wallet's first transaction.

The creator in the middle, the wallets that bought in the launch block around it (bigger bubble = bigger share of supply), and the wallets that funded them on the outside. Buyers with the same colour were funded by the same wallet.

What we find when we compare the coin's website, code, token, launch timing, liquidity, ticker and wallets against each other and against public address labels.

• Money out$2,803 (29.2 SOL) taken out in the first 24 hours by 5 of the dev and launch-block wallets. source
• The teamThe dev and 4 early buyer/holder wallets. source
• The story behind itThe coin's story is an X post by @Paulsmi46867773. The post doesn't name this coin: the coin borrows its story. source
• Website doesn't show this token's addressThe token's address doesn't appear on its website or in the site's code; the site shows other addresses (6zyP…pump, So11…1112, Toke…Q5DA). source
• On-chain features in the codeThe site's code contains wallet or contract code. source
• Website age vs launchThe Internet Archive first saved the site 58 days before the coin launched. source
• Liquidity depthPool liquidity is $2.2K, 113.4% of the $1.9K market cap. Selling 1% of the supply (about $19) would get roughly 1.7% less than the quoted price (estimate for a standard pool). source
• Same ticker elsewhere29 other coins trade as $WI. The biggest is Woke Inu on arc ($25.1K, first pool 21h ago). source
• Contract permissions (GoPlus)GoPlus finds none of the risky permissions it checks for. source
• Reused websiteThe website otcdesks.cash is also listed by 200 other coins we checked: $KINK, $A71, $Teddy ×3, $CAPE…. This coin is far bigger than any of them, so it most likely owns the website and they are using it. source

How earlier coins with the same signals did: the share that fell 80% or more within 24 hours of our check, against coins without the signal. It describes past coins; it doesn't predict this one. All signals

• Checked isn't the same as safe: these checks describe what the token allows and what the website runs, not what anyone will do.
• "Nothing found" means not visible on the public page; servers and private code are invisible to us. Not financial advice.