$Save Bow
Bow
97eEq893ExhtaEZTY5jzdRtBjgQSQy4bVjRhi6JtLUuL
Trading for 20h; 20% of supply went to 4 launch-block wallets (incl. crew #9fbad4); no mint or freeze power left; 202 holders, top 10 hold 82%.
- The story behind itThe coin's story is an X post by @thegoat195923 (verified) with 74 likes. It was posted 1 h before the coin's first pool. The post doesn't name this coin: the coin borrows its story. 6 other coins we checked use the same post.
@thegoat195923 verified · 74 likes · 34 replies
they just made a article on it? they dont actually hold bow send fees to the woner https://t.co/cAMrAxP0Wm
Posted 1 h before the coin's first pool. The post doesn't name this coin: the coin borrows its story. 6 other coins we checked use the same post.
Market data from DexScreener (updates live while this page is open), holders from GeckoTerminal: third-party context, not part of the evidence.
Launch tape (log time from creation)
At a glance
- Control powers left0
- Bought in the launch block19.9% by 4 wallets
- Held by top 1082%
- Socialssite X
Facts read from the chain and the coin's own pages. Checked isn't the same as safe.
Live activity
What we're seeing
- Waiting for trades…
Latest trades
Most active wallets (in the trades we've read)
| Wallet | Bought | Sold | Net | Trades | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Waiting for trades… | |||||
Trades from GeckoTerminal's public feed, refreshed every few seconds while this page is open. Wallet ages and funders: our own reads of each wallet's first transaction. Flags describe what happened, not why.
Cross-checks
What we find when we compare the coin's website, code, token, launch timing, liquidity, ticker and wallets against each other and against public address labels.
- The teamThe dev and 3 early buyer/holder wallets; 2 connected to the dev (funding or crew), holding 19.9%; their 186 earlier coins with an outcome: 16 fell 80%+, 170 went 2x+ within a day. source
- The story behind itThe coin's story is an X post by @thegoat195923 (verified) with 74 likes. It was posted 1 h before the coin's first pool. The post doesn't name this coin: the coin borrows its story. 6 other coins we checked use the same post. source
- On-chain features in the codeThe site's code contains wallet or contract code. source
- Contract permissions (GoPlus)GoPlus finds none of the risky permissions it checks for. source
- Wallets with a winning record bought the launch3 launch-block buyers have a record in our checks: their earlier launch buys were worth 2x or more a day later. The best: 108 of 115 (7oDF…kQ2A). source
- Reused X postThe X post x.com/thegoat195923/status/2114526159140487398 is also listed by 6 other coins we checked: $Bow, $Bow, $Bow, $Bow…. So many coins list it that it's most likely someone else's, borrowed for the story. source
- Reused websiteThe website usepaid.app is also listed by 154 other coins we checked: $PAID, $Hugo, $DICKBUTTIFIER, $DICKBUTIFI…. So many coins list it that it's most likely someone else's, borrowed for the story. source
Track record of these signals
How earlier coins with the same signals did: the share that fell 80% or more within 24 hours of our check, against coins without the signal. It describes past coins; it doesn't predict this one. All signals
| Signal this coin has | Fell 80%+ with it | Without it | Coins |
|---|---|---|---|
| Top 10 hold 50%+ | 56% | 47% | 582 |
| Launch buyers that buy many launches | 46% | 52% | 844 |
| A launch crew bought the launch block | 67% | 49% | 93 |
The team
The dev, the wallets that bought the launch block, and holders the dev funded: how they're connected and how their earlier coins did. The launch map below draws the connections.
| PYUx…k1iU | early buyer | crew #9fbad4 | 94 earlier coins: 2 fell 80%+, 40 2x+ |
| AnT9…LhZN | early buyer · 19.9% | crew #9fbad4 | 2 earlier coins |
| 7oDF…kQ2A | early buyer | 340 earlier coins: 7 fell 80%+, 108 2x+ | |
| 2Wpe…p93t | early buyer | 236 earlier coins: 9 fell 80%+, 93 2x+ |
Launch crews in this coin
Groups of wallets that keep buying launch blocks together, across coins we checked. A crew is a buying pattern; it doesn't say who runs it.
| crew #9fbad4 | 2 of its 4 wallets bought here | 7 launches together | 0 of 2 fell 80%+ in 24 h |
Repeat launch buyers
4 of the wallets that bought this coin's launch block also bought the launch block of other coins we checked. Sniper bots and launch groups both look like this.
| 7oDF…kQ2A | 340 other launches | 2147… 24Yc… 2AR1… 2CAy… |
| 2Wpe…p93t | 236 other launches | 28BV… 2DGo… 2Dap… 2Gtf… |
| PYUx…k1iU | 94 other launches | 2DGo… 2Dap… 2KNv… 2LQA… |
| AnT9…LhZN | 2 other launches | 6mSw… BFkT… |
Holder map
The 20 biggest holders (bigger bubble = bigger share). Grey: pools and known services. Pink: wallets RugCheck flags as insiders. Same colour with a line to an outer dot: first funded by the same wallet. Liquidity locked: 79.3%.
Holders, insider flags, labels and liquidity locks: RugCheck. Shared funders: our own read of each wallet's first transaction.
Launch map
The creator in the middle, the wallets that bought in the launch block around it (bigger bubble = bigger share of supply), and the wallets that funded them on the outside. Buyers with the same colour were funded by the same wallet.
The token
0 control powers left
- Mint new tokens: locked
- Freeze wallets: locked
- Change name, logo and links: locked
The website
0 of None tech claims backed
- Wallet connection: evidence found
- Trading / swaps / bots: evidence found
- Live data / analytics: evidence found
- Checked isn't the same as safe: these checks describe what the token allows and what the website runs, not what anyone will do.
- "Nothing found" means not visible on the public page; servers and private code are invisible to us. Not financial advice.