$TECH

Groups of wallets that keep buying the same coins: launch crews (they buy launch blocks together) and holder guilds (they sit among the top holders of the same coins). Only groups with 2+ wallets in this coin.

The dev is one of 64 linked wallets; together they created 109 coins we checked, and 33 of 58 with an outcome fell 80%+ within a day; members bought 4 launch blocks.

Coins they created: $FI, $true, $Mamesuke, $Mamesuke, $Polycrisis, $ANSEM, $MrBeast, $Gemini, $INU, $Pill, $wokeDOGE, $EDS

Linked when one first funded the other, or both bought in the same small launch crew. Busy wallets (exchanges, services) are never used to join wallets.

The dev, the wallets that bought the launch block, and holders the dev funded: how they're connected and how their earlier coins did. The launch map below draws the connections.

Creator wallet 8EMVfs5pdrV7DAJP4xSZ1gMMbRHexM4J3ZassMpCmSJZ (from GeckoTerminal). We've checked 45 other coins from it:

Who each of the biggest holders is to this launch, from the launch block, first funding, insider flags, known groups and each wallet's first trade.

Source RugCheck, read 30 Oct 2026.

The 20 biggest holders (bigger bubble = bigger share). Grey: pools and known services. Pink: wallets RugCheck flags as insiders. Same colour with a line to an outer dot: first funded by the same wallet. Linked holders hold 2.09%. Liquidity locked: 100%.

Holders, insider flags, labels and liquidity locks: RugCheck. Shared funders: our own read of each wallet's first transaction.

What we find when we compare the coin's website, code, token, launch timing, liquidity, ticker and wallets against each other and against public address labels.

• Cabals in this coin1 known group of wallets is in this coin. The largest, holder guild #g8263e, has 12 of its 58 wallets here: 16.73% held at our check. 32 of the 56 coins it was in with an outcome fell 80%+ within a day. source
• Linked walletsThe dev is one of 64 linked wallets; together they created 109 coins we checked, and 33 of 58 with an outcome fell 80%+ within a day; members bought 4 launch blocks. source
• The teamThe dev and 0 early buyer/holder wallets; their 35 earlier coins with an outcome: 22 fell 80%+, 5 went 2x+ within a day. source
• The story behind itThe coin's story is an X post by @jimcramer (verified) with 473 likes. The post names this coin. 2 other coins we checked use the same post. source
• Same ticker elsewhere6 other coins trade as $TECH. None of them has a pool with real liquidity behind its price. source
• Contract permissions (GoPlus)GoPlus finds none of the risky permissions it checks for. source
• Creator's earlier coinsThis creator launched 45 other coins we checked. Of the 35 with a 24 h outcome, 22 fell 80% or more within a day.
• Reused X postThe X post x.com/jimcramer/status/2116165009898135567 is also listed by 2 other coins we checked: $TECH, $TECH. 1 of them came earlier. source

How earlier coins with the same signals did: the share that fell 80% or more within 24 hours of our check, against coins without the signal. It describes past coins; it doesn't predict this one. All signals

• Checked isn't the same as safe: these checks describe what the token allows and what the website runs, not what anyone will do.
• "Nothing found" means not visible on the public page; servers and private code are invisible to us. Not financial advice.