$Tech

The 3 wallets that bought in the launch block (the first two blocks, under a second) took 35.64% of the supply. Grouped by the wallet that first funded them: 1 linked group holds 35.47% of it.

Grey = a wallet with no funding link to the others. Taken out = sales minus buys plus liquidity out minus in, from the money-out measurement above.

The dev, the wallets that bought the launch block, and holders the dev funded: how they're connected and how their earlier coins did. The launch map below draws the connections.

1 of the wallets that bought this coin's launch block also bought the launch block of other coins we checked. Sniper bots and launch groups both look like this.

Creator wallet AzYE9g4hfcicz7S7QSP1kWE93GPyC3jjEspGoYH9gSUj (from GeckoTerminal). No other coins from this wallet in our records yet. Open the wallet ›

On chain, this wallet launched 3 coins on pump.fun; 2 graduated to a DEX. Its biggest launches (graduated first, then by SOL raised on the curve):

$HypersGraduated to a DEX Graduated – $MutantStayed on the pump.fun curve – – 0.45 SOL raised

See all 3 launches ›

Who each of the biggest holders is to this launch, from the launch block, first funding, insider flags, known groups and each wallet's first trade.

Source RugCheck, read 22 min ago.

The 20 biggest holders (bigger bubble = bigger share). Grey: pools and known services. Pink: wallets RugCheck flags as insiders. Same colour with a line to an outer dot: first funded by the same wallet. Liquidity locked: 100%.

Holders, insider flags, labels and liquidity locks: RugCheck. Shared funders: our own read of each wallet's first transaction.

The creator in the middle, the wallets that bought in the launch block around it (bigger bubble = bigger share of supply), and the wallets that funded them on the outside. Buyers with the same colour were funded by the same wallet.

What we find when we compare the coin's website, code, token, launch timing, liquidity, ticker and wallets against each other and against public address labels.

• Creator's launchesThe creator wallet has launched 3 coins on pump.fun (counted on chain from its bonding curves); we checked 1 of them.
• The teamThe dev and 2 early buyer/holder wallets; their 25 earlier coins with an outcome: 19 fell 80%+, 1 went 2x+ within a day. source
• The story behind itThe coin's story is an X post by @usetechtools (verified) with 18 likes. It was posted 1 min before the coin's first pool. The post names this coin. source
• Website shows this token's addressThe token's address appears on its website or in the site's code. source
• AI claim, no AI calls seenThe site claims AI, but none of its pages called an AI service while we watched (it may run on its own servers). source
• On-chain features in the codeThe site's code contains wallet or contract code. source
• Website age vs launchThe Internet Archive had no saved copy of the site (asked 22 min ago): it is probably as new as the coin.
• Liquidity depthPool liquidity is $11.4K, 40.2% of the $28.5K market cap. Selling 1% of the supply (about $285) would get roughly 4.7% less than the quoted price (estimate for a standard pool). source
• Same ticker elsewhere8 other coins trade as $Tech. The biggest is Tech on Robinhood Chain ($18.1K, first pool 24m ago). source
• Reused websiteThe website usetechtools.fun is also listed by 2 other coins we checked: $ELON ×2. source
• Known address: creator's first funderThe creator's first funder 8DfH…m8hU is Binance (proof-of-reserves wallet). Source: binance-por. source

How earlier coins with the same signals did: the share that fell 80% or more within 24 hours of our check, against coins without the signal. It describes past coins; it doesn't predict this one. All signals

• Checked isn't the same as safe: these checks describe what the token allows and what the website runs, not what anyone will do.
• "Nothing found" means not visible on the public page; servers and private code are invisible to us. Not financial advice.