$猫斯拉

The 4 wallets that bought in the launch block (the first two blocks, under a second) took 19.95% of the supply. Grouped by the wallet that first funded them: 1 linked group holds 19.95% of it.

Grey = a wallet with no funding link to the others. Taken out = sales minus buys plus liquidity out minus in, from the money-out measurement above.

The dev is one of 3 linked wallets; together they created 3 coins we checked.

Coins they created: $BUTTHOLE, $猫斯拉 ×2

Linked when one first funded the other, or both bought in the same small launch crew. Busy wallets (exchanges, services) are never used to join wallets.

The dev, the wallets that bought the launch block, and holders the dev funded: how they're connected and how their earlier coins did. The launch map below draws the connections.

3 of the wallets that bought this coin's launch block also bought the launch block of other coins we checked. Sniper bots and launch groups both look like this.

Creator wallet DzWMVL7oVDULV7XHQMApBZC3a9pzBWygxGZ8EoEMW7DY (from GeckoTerminal). 2 other coins from it in our records: Open the wallet ›

2 red

$BUTTHOLEVampThe team's earlier coins: 23 of 23 fell 80%+ within a day; the pool is empty; copies the ticker of an older, b 23 $0at scan 32m ago $猫斯拉NarrativeThe dev held 14% at scan; the team's earlier coins: 22 of 23 fell 80%+ within a day; the same X post is linked 18 $0at scan 1h ago

Who each of the biggest holders is to this launch, from the launch block, first funding, insider flags, known groups and each wallet's first trade.

Source RugCheck, read 1 h ago.

The 20 biggest holders (bigger bubble = bigger share). Grey: pools and known services. Pink: wallets RugCheck flags as insiders. Same colour with a line to an outer dot: first funded by the same wallet. Liquidity locked: 0.0%.

Holders, insider flags, labels and liquidity locks: RugCheck. Shared funders: our own read of each wallet's first transaction.

The creator in the middle, the wallets that bought in the launch block around it (bigger bubble = bigger share of supply), and the wallets that funded them on the outside. Buyers with the same colour were funded by the same wallet.

What we find when we compare the coin's website, code, token, launch timing, liquidity, ticker and wallets against each other and against public address labels.

• Linked walletsThe dev is one of 3 linked wallets; together they created 3 coins we checked. source
• The teamThe dev and 3 early buyer/holder wallets; their 24 earlier coins with an outcome: 23 fell 80%+, 0 went 2x+ within a day. source
• The story behind itThe coin's story is an X post by @nyankorooow (verified) with 706,386 likes. It was posted 17 h before the coin's first pool. The post doesn't name this coin: the coin borrows its story. 11 other coins we checked use the same post. source
• Liquidity depthPool liquidity is $0, 0.0% of the $755 market cap. Selling 1% of the supply (about $8) would get roughly 99.9% less than the quoted price (estimate for a standard pool). source
• Same ticker elsewhere20 other coins trade as $猫斯拉. The biggest is 猫斯拉 on BNB Chain ($42.4K, first pool 45m ago). source
• Creator's earlier coinsThis creator launched 2 other coins we checked.
• Reused X postThe X post x.com/nyankorooow/status/2121724931318722876 is also listed by 11 other coins we checked: $ニャジラ ×5, $ニャジ ×3, $Nyajira, $猫斯拉 ×2. So many coins list it that it's most likely someone else's, borrowed for the story. source

How earlier coins with the same signals did: the share that fell 80% or more within 24 hours of our check, against coins without the signal. It describes past coins; it doesn't predict this one. All signals

• Checked isn't the same as safe: these checks describe what the token allows and what the website runs, not what anyone will do.
• "Nothing found" means not visible on the public page; servers and private code are invisible to us. Not financial advice.