$FAIR

The 2 wallets that bought in the launch block (the first two blocks, under a second) took 20.05% of the supply. Grouped by the wallet that first funded them: 1 linked group holds 20.05% of it.

Grey = a wallet with no funding link to the others. Taken out = sales minus buys plus liquidity out minus in, from the money-out measurement above.

The dev, the wallets that bought the launch block, and holders the dev funded: how they're connected and how their earlier coins did. The launch map below draws the connections.

1 of the wallets that bought this coin's launch block also bought the launch block of other coins we checked. Sniper bots and launch groups both look like this.

Other coins in our records tied to this creator through the wallet that first funded it.

Creator wallet 8gwTnK2doTLxcBrJCak69RFDicibA34yup6x6yezKWn6 (from GeckoTerminal). 1 other coin from it in our records: Open the wallet ›

1 yellow

$FartdogeTechDev wallet is less than a day old; the AI agent saw none of 1 claimed features working 63 23d ago

Who each of the biggest holders is to this launch, from the launch block, first funding, insider flags, known groups and each wallet's first trade.

Source RugCheck, read 1 h ago.

The 20 biggest holders (bigger bubble = bigger share). Grey: pools and known services. Pink: wallets RugCheck flags as insiders. Same colour with a line to an outer dot: first funded by the same wallet. Liquidity locked: 0.0%.

Holders, insider flags, labels and liquidity locks: RugCheck. Shared funders: our own read of each wallet's first transaction.

The creator in the middle, the wallets that bought in the launch block around it (bigger bubble = bigger share of supply), and the wallets that funded them on the outside. Buyers with the same colour were funded by the same wallet.

What we find when we compare the coin's website, code, token, launch timing, liquidity, ticker and wallets against each other and against public address labels.

• The teamThe dev and 1 early buyer/holder wallet; 1063 earlier coins together, outcomes still coming in. source
• Website names another $FAIRThe website shows Fair…TpTg, a coin also called $FAIR, first pool 3 h before this one, and not this token's address: this coin may be borrowing that project's website. source
• Website age vs launchThe Internet Archive had no saved copy of the site (asked 3 h ago): it is probably as new as the coin.
• Liquidity depthPool liquidity is $0, 0.0% of the $55.4K market cap. Selling 1% of the supply (about $554) would get roughly 100.0% less than the quoted price (estimate for a standard pool). source
• Same ticker elsewhere24 other coins trade as $FAIR. The biggest is FAIR on Solana ($248K, first pool 4h ago). An older coin with the same name (BLvS…DFv6) had its pool go from $160K to $0 57m ago. source
• Linked launches1 other coin in our records connects to this creator through funding: $Solcasino (creator funded by this creator).
• Contract permissions (GoPlus)GoPlus finds none of the risky permissions it checks for. source
• Creator's earlier coinsThis creator launched 1 other coin we checked.
• Reused X accountThe X account @LaunchFairly is also listed by 6 other coins we checked: $FAIR ×6. So many coins list it that it's most likely someone else's, borrowed for the story. source
• Reused websiteThe website launchfair.fun is also listed by 8 other coins we checked: $FAIR ×8. So many coins list it that it's most likely someone else's, borrowed for the story. source

How earlier coins with the same signals did: the share that fell 80% or more within 24 hours of our check, against coins without the signal. It describes past coins; it doesn't predict this one. All signals

• Checked isn't the same as safe: these checks describe what the token allows and what the website runs, not what anyone will do.
• "Nothing found" means not visible on the public page; servers and private code are invisible to us. Not financial advice.