$WORM / Agent Wormhole

The dev, the wallets that bought the launch block, and holders the dev funded: how they're connected and how their earlier coins did. The launch map below draws the connections.

Creator wallet 0x3711cea4feade896c913c68f01eda97cb06d1a42 (from GeckoTerminal). 7 other coins from it in our records. It is also named for large coins ($microduck): one person rarely launches several, so this is most likely a shared deployer or GeckoTerminal's guess, and the list isn't counted as this dev's record:

1 green2 yellow2 red1 of 1 judged fell 80%+ within a day

$BLIPLT Blip LateTechThe dev held none at scan, nothing on record; tech not tested yet 64 2d ago $COLLECTIBLE Collectible CoinNarrativeThe dev held none at scan, nothing on record; no X account, Telegram or website linked 72 -100%a day after scan 4d ago $WOFLTechThe dev held none at scan, nothing on record; the price ran past its pool (pool 15% of the cap); website doesn 34 $340Kat scan 11d ago $SURPLUS SurplusLLMTechReused website, a relaunch pattern; the price ran past its pool (pool 22% of the cap) 32 $171Kat scan 13d ago $microduckNot scanned yet. – $3.6Mat scan 19d ago $VRAXNot scanned yet. – $3.4Mat scan 20d ago $SEASON Farming SeasonTechThe dev held none at scan, nothing on record; website doesn't show this token's address 63 $64.0Kat scan 21d ago

Who each of the biggest holders is to this launch, from the launch block, first funding, insider flags, known groups and each wallet's first trade.

Source GoPlus's top holder list (people only: pools, burns, locks and contracts left out), read 14 min ago.

What we find when we compare the coin's website, code, token, launch timing, liquidity, ticker and wallets against each other and against public address labels.

• The teamOnly the dev wallet: no early buyer or holder wallets found with it. source
• Website shows this token's addressThe token's address appears on its website or in the site's code. source
• AI claim, no AI calls seenThe site claims AI, but none of its pages called an AI service while we watched (it may run on its own servers). source
• On-chain features in the codeThe site's code contains wallet or contract code. source
• Website age vs launchThe Internet Archive first saved the site 21 days before the coin launched. source
• Code age vs launchThe GitHub repository runningoffcode/agent-wormhole was created 96 days before the coin launched. source
• Liquidity depthPool liquidity is $90.6K, 7.5% of the $1.2M market cap. Selling 1% of the supply (about $12.1K) would get roughly 21.0% less than the quoted price (estimate for a standard pool). source
• Same ticker elsewhere14 other coins trade as $WORM. None of them has real liquidity and trading behind its price. source
• Contract permissions (GoPlus)GoPlus finds none of the risky permissions it checks for. source
• Creator's earlier coinsThe address named as this coin's creator is also named for 7 other coins we checked, large ones among them ($microduck). One person rarely launches several big coins, so it is most likely a shared deployer or a data source's guess: not counted as a record.
• Reused X accountThe X account @agentwormhole is also listed by 18 other coins we checked: $WORM ×18. This coin is far bigger than any of them, so it most likely owns the X account and they are using it. source
• Reused Telegram groupThe Telegram group t.me/agentwormhole1 is also listed by 18 other coins we checked: $WORM ×18. This coin is far bigger than any of them, so it most likely owns the Telegram group and they are using it. source
• Reused websiteThe website agentwormhole.com is also listed by 18 other coins we checked: $WORM ×18. This coin is far bigger than any of them, so it most likely owns the website and they are using it. source

• Checked isn't the same as safe: these checks describe what the token allows and what the website runs, not what anyone will do.
• "Nothing found" means not visible on the public page; servers and private code are invisible to us. Not financial advice.