$TOMAMInew$15.5K+48.6%$MESHnew$24.8K+17.0%SE$SEALSnew$13.4K+130.0%SE$SEALSnew$26.8K+439.0%PA$PAIRnew$13.4K+58.3%$UCLBOTnew$24.3M+27.1%$SEALSnew$51.4K+31.4%$SLOPINUnew$2.0M+17.1%PA$PAIRnew$123K+1352.0%GL$Glissenew$11.4K+384.0%$PAIRnew$14.7K+55.9%$Ctkbatnew$49.2K-99.7%$tradernew$97.6K+129.0%AB$ABUnew$19.3K+104.0%MO$MOONnew$16.5K+181.0%$Yesnew$149K+1666.0%$PWCGSTnew$54.8K-99.7%$XTOnew$24.4M+58885.0%BP$BPILLnew$11.6K+37.4%$Picklesnew$35.5K+291.0%$TOMAMInew$41.0K+1346.0%BE$BETTERnew$20.5K+248.0%$XTOnew$68.4M+163771.0%$GREENnew$39.4K+203.0%FT$FTOFnew$254K+0.0%BI$bitnew$42.7K+23.4%TM$TMTNnew$20.1K+129.0%ME$MEMEnew$14.0K+64.9%$CHILLCHInew$40.9K+1368.0%SL$SLOPINUnew$100K+128.0%MG$MGCnew$104K$LILGUYnew$51.7K+25.0%$VEIL$729K-43.6%$PAID$2.6M-8.9%$BATON$5.2M-7.0%$DARK$832K-10.6%$XTO$13.4M+11.7%$MISTAKE$113K-85.0%$HOOKED$1.0M-16.2%$E/ACC$400K-11.4%
Contract blueprint · 12 h ago

TRENCHORS on Base

0x1ef84bbe757664579637e499eb8a639509f041d0

Template-written 5 evidence items REA inspect-evm-interface (in WSL)
What this means for you

TRENCHORS on Base: no owner switches found among its 11 functions.E2E5

  • The contract has no owner() function, so there's no single owner wallet to check.E5

What it is

  • It's a token called 8453 Trenchors (TRENCHORS).E3
  • Total supply: 100,000,000,000 tokens.E4
  • Besides the standard token functions it has increaseAllowance and decreaseAllowance.E2
  • We read 11 functions from its public code with REA inspect-evm-interface (in WSL).E2E1

What the owner can do

No functions match known owner powers (mint, pause, block wallets, change fees or limits, open/close trading, replace the code).E2

Chain
Base
Address
0x1ef84bbe757664579637e499eb8a639509f041d0
Token
8453 Trenchors (TRENCHORS)
Supply
100,000,000,000 tokens
Owner
no owner() function
Engine
REA inspect-evm-interface (in WSL)
All 11 functions
name()approve(address,uint256) · nonpayabletotalSupply()transferFrom(address,address,uint256) · nonpayabledecimals()increaseAllowance(address,uint256) · nonpayablebalanceOf(address)symbol()decreaseAllowance(address,uint256) · nonpayabletransfer(address,uint256) · nonpayableallowance(address,address)

Evidence

Every sentence above points to one of these. Code references show the file, line:column and the short identifier that matched, never the site's code itself.

E1
4,844 bytes of contract code on Base
eth_getCode on Base · 0x1ef84bbe757664579637e499eb8a639509f041d0 · sha256 7b0271102423db6c…
E2
11 functions extracted with REA inspect-evm-interface (in WSL)
Base bytecode 0x1ef84bbe… · “11 selectors” · REA inspect-evm-interface (in WSL)
E3
Token name/symbol: 8453 Trenchors (TRENCHORS)
eth_call name() / symbol() on Base · 0x1ef84bbe757664579637e499eb8a639509f041d0
E4
Total supply: 100,000,000,000 tokens
eth_call totalSupply() / decimals() on Base · 0x1ef84bbe757664579637e499eb8a639509f041d0
E5
No owner() function in the contract
Base bytecode · “no 0x8da5cb5b selector” · REA inspect-evm-interface (in WSL)

Limits

  • Powers are read from the contract's function list. A power hidden behind an unnamed function can't be explained, only counted.
  • Who holds a power is only checked through owner(). Roles, multisigs and proxy admins may hold powers too.
  • This describes what the code allows, not what anyone will do. It isn't financial advice.
  • This text was written from fixed templates because no AI writer was available. It uses exactly the same evidence.

Facts, not judgements: this page describes what the code and traffic show, not anyone's intent. Not financial advice. Case id xyyUaBwA.