$BNB Standanew
$TPFALCNnew
$.AiTownnew
$ASQUADnew
$MEOWVINCInew
$PETERnew
$KANEnew
$Nothingnew
$VEIL
$PAID
$BATON
$DARK
$XTO
$MISTAKE
$HOOKED
$E/ACC
$NEX Ai
Nexchain Ai
gUc6wVUXwnbQcHyYQDZMAKF98nYxt8tBsQE59PinDLD
Trading for 16h; no mint or freeze power left; 83 holders, top 10 hold 6%.
- AI claim, no AI calls seenThe site claims AI, but none of its pages called an AI service while we watched (it may run on its own servers).
Market data from DexScreener (updates live while this page is open), holders from GeckoTerminal: third-party context, not part of the evidence.
Launch tape (log time from creation)
At a glance
- Control powers left0
- Bought in the launch block0.0% by 0 wallets
- Held by top 106%
- Socialssite X
Facts read from the chain and the coin's own pages. Checked isn't the same as safe.
Live activity
What we're seeing
- Waiting for trades…
Latest trades
Most active wallets (in the trades we've read)
| Wallet | Bought | Sold | Net | Trades | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Waiting for trades… | |||||
Trades from GeckoTerminal's public feed, refreshed every few seconds while this page is open. Wallet ages and funders: our own reads of each wallet's first transaction. Flags describe what happened, not why.
Cross-checks
What we find when we compare the coin's website, code, token, launch timing, liquidity, ticker and wallets against each other and against public address labels.
- AI claim, no AI calls seenThe site claims AI, but none of its pages called an AI service while we watched (it may run on its own servers). source
- Same ticker elsewhere29 other coins trade as $NEX Ai. The biggest is Nexchain Ai on Solana ($4.1B, first pool 5h ago). source
- Contract permissions (GoPlus)GoPlus finds none of the risky permissions it checks for. source
- Reused X accountThe X account @Nexchain_ai is also listed by 200 other coins we checked: $NEX Ai, $NEX Ai, $NEX Ai, $NEX Ai…. So many coins list it that it's most likely someone else's, borrowed for the story. source
- Reused websiteThe website nex.ai is also listed by 200 other coins we checked: $NEX Ai, $NEX Ai, $NEX Ai, $NEX Ai…. So many coins list it that it's most likely someone else's, borrowed for the story. source
Track record of these signals
How earlier coins with the same signals did: the share that fell 80% or more within 24 hours of our check, against coins without the signal. It describes past coins; it doesn't predict this one. All signals
| Signal this coin has | Fell 80%+ with it | Without it | Coins |
|---|---|---|---|
| Liquidity not locked | 48% | 50% | 209 |
The launch block
0 wallets bought 0.0% of the supply in the same block the coin was created (or the next one). Many buyers there usually means a scripted, "bundled" launch.
Holder map
The 20 biggest holders (bigger bubble = bigger share). Grey: pools and known services. Pink: wallets RugCheck flags as insiders. Same colour with a line to an outer dot: first funded by the same wallet. Liquidity locked: 0.0%.
Holders, insider flags, labels and liquidity locks: RugCheck. Shared funders: our own read of each wallet's first transaction.
The token
0 control powers left
- Mint new tokens: locked
- Freeze wallets: locked
- Change name, logo and links: locked
The website
0 of None tech claims backed
- AI / agents: nothing found on the public page
- Checked isn't the same as safe: these checks describe what the token allows and what the website runs, not what anyone will do.
- "Nothing found" means not visible on the public page; servers and private code are invisible to us. Not financial advice.