$FILET
Filet-O-Fish
C3W5SXeun2Q5fHTezjHi9xS89bKcpx1qqsRwrrKJis1e
Trading for 9h; no mint or freeze power left; 193 holders, top 10 hold 2%.
- Liquidity depthPool liquidity is $6, 0.0% of the $13.8K market cap. Selling 1% of the supply (about $138) would get roughly 97.8% less than the quoted price (estimate for a standard pool).
@McDonalds verified · 3,917 likes · 348 replies
Filet-O-Fish fans were never wrong, just early
Posted 7 min before the coin's first pool. The post names this coin. 7 other coins we checked use the same post.
Market data from DexScreener (updates live while this page is open), holders from GeckoTerminal: third-party context, not part of the evidence.
Launch tape (log time from creation)
At a glance
- Control powers left0
- Bought in the launch block0.0% by 0 wallets
- Held by top 102%
- Socialssite X
Facts read from the chain and the coin's own pages. Checked isn't the same as safe.
Live activity
What we're seeing
- Waiting for trades…
Latest trades
Most active wallets (in the trades we've read)
| Wallet | Bought | Sold | Net | Trades | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Waiting for trades… | |||||
Trades from GeckoTerminal's public feed, refreshed every few seconds while this page is open. Wallet ages and funders: our own reads of each wallet's first transaction. Flags describe what happened, not why.
Cross-checks
What we find when we compare the coin's website, code, token, launch timing, liquidity, ticker and wallets against each other and against public address labels.
- The story behind itThe coin's story is an X post by @McDonalds (verified) with 3,917 likes. It was posted 7 min before the coin's first pool. The post names this coin. 7 other coins we checked use the same post. source
- Liquidity depthPool liquidity is $6, 0.0% of the $13.8K market cap. Selling 1% of the supply (about $138) would get roughly 97.8% less than the quoted price (estimate for a standard pool). source
- Same ticker elsewhere25 other coins trade as $FILET. The biggest is Filet-O-Fish on Solana ($198K, first pool 9h ago). source
- Contract permissions (GoPlus)GoPlus finds none of the risky permissions it checks for. source
- Reused X postThe X post x.com/mcdonalds/status/2114800939735613640 is also listed by 7 other coins we checked: $FILET, $FILET, $FILET, $FILET…. So many coins list it that it's most likely someone else's, borrowed for the story. source
Track record of these signals
How earlier coins with the same signals did: the share that fell 80% or more within 24 hours of our check, against coins without the signal. It describes past coins; it doesn't predict this one. All signals
| Signal this coin has | Fell 80%+ with it | Without it | Coins |
|---|---|---|---|
| Liquidity not locked | 44% | 50% | 541 |
The launch block
0 wallets bought 0.0% of the supply in the same block the coin was created (or the next one). Many buyers there usually means a scripted, "bundled" launch.
Holder map
The 20 biggest holders (bigger bubble = bigger share). Grey: pools and known services. Pink: wallets RugCheck flags as insiders. Same colour with a line to an outer dot: first funded by the same wallet. Liquidity locked: 0%.
Holders, insider flags, labels and liquidity locks: RugCheck. Shared funders: our own read of each wallet's first transaction.
The token
0 control powers left
- Mint new tokens: locked
- Freeze wallets: locked
- Change name, logo and links: locked
The website
Not scanned yet. Scan solscan.io/token/Bm73nT9VktMo36LqY4acPcEhqswGcE96noyAV2G8nWF1#metadata
- Checked isn't the same as safe: these checks describe what the token allows and what the website runs, not what anyone will do.
- "Nothing found" means not visible on the public page; servers and private code are invisible to us. Not financial advice.