$COINU
Coinbase Inu
BcRWG7tALm7WcBRrCHiZVvAmwoEvMZWt3ksQGaSe2FTe
No mint or freeze power left.
Nothing in our checks stands out for this coin. Checked isn't the same as safe.
@AxTrades32 verified · 11 likes · 13 replies
On Coinbase's site, they have a section titled "What is a memecoin?" where they use this image as their example They literally created their own Inu coin to represent memecoins Coinbase Inu $COINU https://t.co/9Hz5dALx25 https://t.co/QfE5N4zklb
The post names this coin. 1 other coin we checked use the same post.
Market data from DexScreener (updates live while this page is open), holders from GeckoTerminal: third-party context, not part of the evidence.
At a glance
- Control powers left0
- Website tech claims backed1 of 3
- Socialssite X
Facts read from the chain and the coin's own pages. Checked isn't the same as safe.
Live activity
What we're seeing
- Waiting for trades…
Latest trades
Most active wallets (in the trades we've read)
| Wallet | Bought | Sold | Net | Trades | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Waiting for trades… | |||||
Trades from GeckoTerminal's public feed, refreshed every few seconds while this page is open. Wallet ages and funders: our own reads of each wallet's first transaction. Flags describe what happened, not why.
Cross-checks
What we find when we compare the coin's website, code, token, launch timing, liquidity, ticker and wallets against each other and against public address labels.
- The teamThe dev and 0 early buyer/holder wallets. source
- The story behind itThe coin's story is an X post by @AxTrades32 (verified) with 11 likes. The post names this coin. 1 other coin we checked use the same post. source
- On-chain features in the codeThe site's code contains wallet or contract code. source
- Same ticker elsewhere4 other coins trade as $COINU. The biggest is Coinbase Inu on Base ($3.9K, first pool 8d ago). source
- Contract permissions (GoPlus)GoPlus finds none of the risky permissions it checks for. source
- Reused X postThe X post x.com/AxTrades32/status/2112010055746998665 is also listed by 1 other coin we checked: $COINU. source
- Reused websiteThe website coinbase.com is also listed by 4 other coins we checked: $COINU, $NVDAc, $cbHYPE, $AAPLc. So many coins list it that it's most likely someone else's, borrowed for the story. source
Track record of these signals
How earlier coins with the same signals did: the share that fell 80% or more within 24 hours of our check, against coins without the signal. It describes past coins; it doesn't predict this one. All signals
| Signal this coin has | Fell 80%+ with it | Without it | Coins |
|---|---|---|---|
| Website tech claims mostly unbacked | 64% | 48% | 28 |
The team
The dev, the wallets that bought the launch block, and holders the dev funded: how they're connected and how their earlier coins did. The launch map below draws the connections.
| 6UPA…yu4T | early buyer · 100.0% | no earlier coins seen |
Launch map
The creator in the middle, the wallets that bought in the launch block around it (bigger bubble = bigger share of supply), and the wallets that funded them on the outside. Buyers with the same colour were funded by the same wallet.
The token
0 control powers left
- Mint new tokens: locked
- Freeze wallets: locked
- Change name, logo and links: locked
The website
1 of 3 tech claims backed
- On-chain / smart contracts: nothing found on the public page
- Staking / yield: nothing found on the public page
- A working app / platform: evidence found
- Checked isn't the same as safe: these checks describe what the token allows and what the website runs, not what anyone will do.
- "Nothing found" means not visible on the public page; servers and private code are invisible to us. Not financial advice.