BR$Brwraynew$136K+29.0%TR$TRUMP2028new$11.0K+26.7%AS$ASENDnew$12.8K+444.0%$PENCHANTSnew$12.8K+41.4%$CYBERCATnew$15.5K+53.1%$PENCHANTSnew$12.2K+22.2%ME$MESHnew$30.0K+41.6%EL$ELON2028new$69.6K+6.6%羊来$羊来new$32.5K+270.0%EL$ELON2028new$69.5K+6.6%TA$TAOLaunchnew$19.6K+127.0%UN$UNITEnew$81.8K+81.7%PM$PMKTnew$59.2K+652.0%$UNITEnew$23.9K+128.0%$Kyvsirnew$163K+46.9%EL$ELON2028new$69.5K+6.3%PM$PMKTnew$66.1K+740.0%CA$CATSnew$381K+179.0%$AGInew$88.8M+658233.0%AG$AGInew$51.8K+20.3%BA$BASEnew$126K+139.0%$UNIBTCnew$23.0KDR$DRAnew$952K+1488.0%$Ebgennew$76.1K+49.0%$nocatnew$35.0K-15.9%UN$UNITEnew$49.9K+9.5%$BIBInew$1.3M+75923.0%$GANGnew$7.4M+76.2%ZE$ZECnew$122BUN$UNITEnew$49.8K+9.3%AN$ANONnew$25.0K+973.0%OI$OInew$24.0K+176.0%$VEIL$793K-39.3%$PAID$2.7M-5.6%$BATON$4.9M-11.2%$DARK$817K-7.1%$XTO$12.9M+6.5%$MISTAKE$130K-82.6%$HOOKED$983K-14.6%$E/ACC$418K-7.7%
Coin · Solana · graduated 1d ago

$AUC
AudaCity

BGUtsVHty1VtsGPKgX8TjLyzNhzvGfELG2g2em7E1S1E

Receipts checked 25 Oct 2026
Green light86/100
Tech real? 85 Dev & team legit? can't tell yet Launch & holders: 90
Will it send? Of 915 earlier coins rated GREEN, 33% went 2x+ and 37% fell 80%+ within a day of our check. Past coins, not a prediction.
Why: 2 facts weigh against it
  • -15On-chain claim, no wallet code receipt
  • -10Only 0% of the liquidity is locked

No mint or freeze power left; 487 holders, top 10 hold 11%.

No control powers leftLaunch block 0%LP locked 0%Older coin, same ticker
  • The story behind itThe coin's story is an X post by @jdncrtr. The post doesn't name this coin: the coin borrows its story. 8 other coins we checked use the same post.
  • On-chain claim, no wallet codeThe site claims on-chain / smart contracts, but its code has no wallet or contract calls.
  • Same ticker elsewhere29 other coins trade as $AUC. The biggest is AUC on BNB Chain ($9.5B, first pool 22d ago). It is older and bigger than this one, so check you have the address you meant.
The story behind it

@jdncrtr

The post doesn't name this coin: the coin borrows its story. 8 other coins we checked use the same post.

?Market cap $14.7KAt our check ?Since check ?Price 24h ?Volume 24h ?Liquidity 487Holders 11%Held by top 10 ?Since first pool ?Dev's coins checked

Market data from DexScreener (updates live while this page is open), holders from GeckoTerminal: third-party context, not part of the evidence.

Launch tape (log time from creation)

Created Launch block 0% · 0 wallets · +0s Graduated +7m Our check $14.7K · +7m 24 h later $5.7K · +24h Now +33h

At a glance

  • Control powers left0
  • Bought in the launch block0.0% by 0 wallets
  • Held by top 1011%
  • Socialssite X

Facts read from the chain and the coin's own pages. Checked isn't the same as safe.

Live activity

Connecting to the live trades…

What we're seeing

  • Waiting for trades…

Latest trades

Most active wallets (in the trades we've read)

WalletBoughtSoldNetTrades
Waiting for trades…

Trades from GeckoTerminal's public feed, refreshed every few seconds while this page is open. Wallet ages and funders: our own reads of each wallet's first transaction. Flags describe what happened, not why.

Cross-checks

What we find when we compare the coin's website, code, token, launch timing, liquidity, ticker and wallets against each other and against public address labels.

  • The story behind itThe coin's story is an X post by @jdncrtr. The post doesn't name this coin: the coin borrows its story. 8 other coins we checked use the same post. source
  • On-chain claim, no wallet codeThe site claims on-chain / smart contracts, but its code has no wallet or contract calls. source
  • Same ticker elsewhere29 other coins trade as $AUC. The biggest is AUC on BNB Chain ($9.5B, first pool 22d ago). It is older and bigger than this one, so check you have the address you meant. source
  • Contract permissions (GoPlus)GoPlus finds none of the risky permissions it checks for. source
  • Reused X postThe X post x.com/jdncrtr/status/2114470787025351014 is also listed by 8 other coins we checked: $AUC, $AUC, $AUC, $AUC…. So many coins list it that it's most likely someone else's, borrowed for the story. source
  • Reused websiteThe website cyberleek.arwe.io is also listed by 27 other coins we checked: $DAC, $CITY, $CITY, $CITY…. So many coins list it that it's most likely someone else's, borrowed for the story. source

Track record of these signals

How earlier coins with the same signals did: the share that fell 80% or more within 24 hours of our check, against coins without the signal. It describes past coins; it doesn't predict this one. All signals

Signal this coin hasFell 80%+ with itWithout itCoins
Liquidity not locked42%50%616

The launch block

0 wallets bought 0.0% of the supply in the same block the coin was created (or the next one). Many buyers there usually means a scripted, "bundled" launch.

Holder map

The 20 biggest holders (bigger bubble = bigger share). Grey: pools and known services. Pink: wallets RugCheck flags as insiders. Same colour with a line to an outer dot: first funded by the same wallet. Liquidity locked: 0%.

Holders, insider flags, labels and liquidity locks: RugCheck. Shared funders: our own read of each wallet's first transaction.

The token

0 control powers left

  • Mint new tokens: locked
  • Freeze wallets: locked
  • Change name, logo and links: locked
Full token blueprint

The website

0 of None tech claims backed

  • On-chain / smart contracts: evidence found
  • Wallet connection: nothing found on the public page
Full website blueprint
  • Checked isn't the same as safe: these checks describe what the token allows and what the website runs, not what anyone will do.
  • "Nothing found" means not visible on the public page; servers and private code are invisible to us. Not financial advice.