$Agent Citynew
$Amazonnew
$KEYnew
$KEYnew
$姆巴龟new
$KEYnew
$yolonew
$KEYnew
$wienernew
$Wickernew
$ANSEMMONnew
$yolonew
$Cornellnew
$ELON2028new
$BTCTnew
$.AiTownnew
$POKEMOGnew
$TESLA SInew
$SURACInew
$VEIL
$PAID
$BATON
$DARK
$XTO
$MISTAKE
$HOOKED
$E/ACC$RiceGum
5z1j1mRZJ97ShtsrQDXHPu5TRYXmaE5duuNPTrEsD3jk
Trading for 12h; no mint or freeze power left; 296 holders, top 10 hold 95%.
- Liquidity depthPool liquidity is $12, 0.0% of the $26.1K market cap. Selling 1% of the supply (about $261) would get roughly 97.7% less than the quoted price (estimate for a standard pool).
- Reused X accountThe X account @RiceGum is also listed by 1 other coin we checked: $RiceGum. 1 of them came earlier.
Market data from DexScreener (updates live while this page is open), holders from GeckoTerminal: third-party context, not part of the evidence.
Launch tape (log time from creation)
At a glance
- Control powers left0
- Bought in the launch block0.0% by 0 wallets
- Held by top 1095%
- SocialsX
Facts read from the chain and the coin's own pages. Checked isn't the same as safe.
Live activity
What we're seeing
- Waiting for trades…
Latest trades
Most active wallets (in the trades we've read)
| Wallet | Bought | Sold | Net | Trades | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Waiting for trades… | |||||
Trades from GeckoTerminal's public feed, refreshed every few seconds while this page is open. Wallet ages and funders: our own reads of each wallet's first transaction. Flags describe what happened, not why.
Cross-checks
What we find when we compare the coin's website, code, token, launch timing, liquidity, ticker and wallets against each other and against public address labels.
- Liquidity depthPool liquidity is $12, 0.0% of the $26.1K market cap. Selling 1% of the supply (about $261) would get roughly 97.7% less than the quoted price (estimate for a standard pool). source
- Same ticker elsewhere7 other coins trade as $RiceGum. The biggest is RiceGum on Solana ($42.0K, first pool 12h ago). source
- Contract permissions (GoPlus)GoPlus finds none of the risky permissions it checks for. source
- Reused X accountThe X account @RiceGum is also listed by 1 other coin we checked: $RiceGum. 1 of them came earlier. source
Track record of these signals
How earlier coins with the same signals did: the share that fell 80% or more within 24 hours of our check, against coins without the signal. It describes past coins; it doesn't predict this one. All signals
| Signal this coin has | Fell 80%+ with it | Without it | Coins |
|---|---|---|---|
| Top 10 hold 50%+ | 54% | 47% | 705 |
| Liquidity not locked | 44% | 50% | 485 |
The launch block
0 wallets bought 0.0% of the supply in the same block the coin was created (or the next one). Many buyers there usually means a scripted, "bundled" launch.
Holder map
The 20 biggest holders (bigger bubble = bigger share). Grey: pools and known services. Pink: wallets RugCheck flags as insiders. Same colour with a line to an outer dot: first funded by the same wallet. Liquidity locked: 0%.
Holders, insider flags, labels and liquidity locks: RugCheck. Shared funders: our own read of each wallet's first transaction.
The token
0 control powers left
- Mint new tokens: locked
- Freeze wallets: locked
- Change name, logo and links: locked
The website
The token's metadata lists no website of its own.
- Checked isn't the same as safe: these checks describe what the token allows and what the website runs, not what anyone will do.
- "Nothing found" means not visible on the public page; servers and private code are invisible to us. Not financial advice.