$LMAOnew
$AInew
$NTFOnew
$Dugnew
$OnlyCatsnew
$NCGUPPYnew
$ADAMnew
$DCTnew
$PKRnew
$XOTnew
$Qforknew
$XTOnew
$PAPEROnew
$DeepSeeknew
$REMnew
$Buffalonew
$VEIL
$PAID
$BATON
$DARK
$XTO
$MISTAKE
$HOOKED
$E/ACC$AUC
AudaCity
4S3Wzvyt3xWrmTYwQvzRFfCyvLmerWSjQceoGHWq9fkA
Trading for 23h; no mint or freeze power left; 407 holders, top 10 hold 7%.
- The story behind itThe coin's story is an X post by @jdncrtr. The post doesn't name this coin: the coin borrows its story. 8 other coins we checked use the same post.
- On-chain claim, no wallet codeThe site claims on-chain / smart contracts, but its code has no wallet or contract calls.
- Liquidity depthPool liquidity is $0, 0.1% of the $96 market cap. Selling 1% of the supply (about $1) would get roughly 97.5% less than the quoted price (estimate for a standard pool).
- Same ticker elsewhere29 other coins trade as $AUC. The biggest is AUC on BNB Chain ($8.5B, first pool 22d ago). It is older and bigger than this one, so check you have the address you meant.
The post doesn't name this coin: the coin borrows its story. 8 other coins we checked use the same post.
Market data from DexScreener (updates live while this page is open), holders from GeckoTerminal: third-party context, not part of the evidence.
Launch tape (log time from creation)
At a glance
- Control powers left0
- Bought in the launch block0.0% by 0 wallets
- Held by top 107%
- Socialssite X Telegram
Facts read from the chain and the coin's own pages. Checked isn't the same as safe.
Live activity
What we're seeing
- Waiting for trades…
Latest trades
Most active wallets (in the trades we've read)
| Wallet | Bought | Sold | Net | Trades | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Waiting for trades… | |||||
Trades from GeckoTerminal's public feed, refreshed every few seconds while this page is open. Wallet ages and funders: our own reads of each wallet's first transaction. Flags describe what happened, not why.
Cross-checks
What we find when we compare the coin's website, code, token, launch timing, liquidity, ticker and wallets against each other and against public address labels.
- The story behind itThe coin's story is an X post by @jdncrtr. The post doesn't name this coin: the coin borrows its story. 8 other coins we checked use the same post. source
- On-chain claim, no wallet codeThe site claims on-chain / smart contracts, but its code has no wallet or contract calls. source
- Liquidity depthPool liquidity is $0, 0.1% of the $96 market cap. Selling 1% of the supply (about $1) would get roughly 97.5% less than the quoted price (estimate for a standard pool). source
- Same ticker elsewhere29 other coins trade as $AUC. The biggest is AUC on BNB Chain ($8.5B, first pool 22d ago). It is older and bigger than this one, so check you have the address you meant. source
- Contract permissions (GoPlus)GoPlus finds none of the risky permissions it checks for. source
- Reused X postThe X post x.com/jdncrtr/status/2114470787025351014 is also listed by 8 other coins we checked: $AUC, $AUC, $AUC, $AUC…. So many coins list it that it's most likely someone else's, borrowed for the story. source
- Reused Telegram groupThe Telegram group t.me/cyberleekario is also listed by 12 other coins we checked: $CITY, $CITY, $CITY, $CITY…. So many coins list it that it's most likely someone else's, borrowed for the story. source
- Reused websiteThe website cyberleek.arwe.io is also listed by 27 other coins we checked: $DAC, $CITY, $CITY, $CITY…. So many coins list it that it's most likely someone else's, borrowed for the story. source
Track record of these signals
How earlier coins with the same signals did: the share that fell 80% or more within 24 hours of our check, against coins without the signal. It describes past coins; it doesn't predict this one. All signals
| Signal this coin has | Fell 80%+ with it | Without it | Coins |
|---|---|---|---|
| Liquidity not locked | 47% | 50% | 176 |
The launch block
0 wallets bought 0.0% of the supply in the same block the coin was created (or the next one). Many buyers there usually means a scripted, "bundled" launch.
Holder map
The 20 biggest holders (bigger bubble = bigger share). Grey: pools and known services. Pink: wallets RugCheck flags as insiders. Same colour with a line to an outer dot: first funded by the same wallet. Liquidity locked: 0%.
Holders, insider flags, labels and liquidity locks: RugCheck. Shared funders: our own read of each wallet's first transaction.
The token
0 control powers left
- Mint new tokens: locked
- Freeze wallets: locked
- Change name, logo and links: locked
The website
0 of None tech claims backed
- On-chain / smart contracts: evidence found
- Wallet connection: nothing found on the public page
- Checked isn't the same as safe: these checks describe what the token allows and what the website runs, not what anyone will do.
- "Nothing found" means not visible on the public page; servers and private code are invisible to us. Not financial advice.