$AUC
AudaCity

What we find when we compare the coin's website, code, token, launch timing, liquidity, ticker and wallets against each other and against public address labels.

• The teamThe dev and 3 early buyer/holder wallets; their 182 earlier coins with an outcome: 16 fell 80%+, 165 went 2x+ within a day. source
• On-chain claim, no wallet codeThe site claims on-chain / smart contracts, but its code has no wallet or contract calls. source
• Liquidity depthPool liquidity is $0, 0.0% of the $20.1K market cap. Selling 1% of the supply (about $201) would get roughly 100.0% less than the quoted price (estimate for a standard pool). source
• Same ticker elsewhere26 other coins trade as $AUC. The biggest is AUC on BNB Chain ($8.6B, first pool 22d ago). It is older and bigger than this one, so check you have the address you meant. source
• Linked launches1 other coin in our records connect to this creator through funding: $Bow (creator funded by this creator).
• Contract permissions (GoPlus)GoPlus finds none of the risky permissions it checks for. source
• Creator's earlier coinsThis creator launched 15 other coins we checked. Of the 13 with a 24 h outcome, 1 fell 80% or more within a day.
• Wallets with a winning record bought the launch3 launch-block buyers have a record in our checks: their earlier launch buys were worth 2x or more a day later. The best: 105 of 112 (7oDF…kQ2A). source
• Reused Telegram groupThe Telegram group t.me/cyberleekario is also listed by 12 other coins we checked: $CITY, $CITY, $CITY, $CITY…. So many coins list it that it's most likely someone else's, borrowed for the story. source
• Reused websiteThe website cyberleek.arwe.io is also listed by 27 other coins we checked: $DAC, $CITY, $CITY, $CITY…. So many coins list it that it's most likely someone else's, borrowed for the story. source

How earlier coins with the same signals did: the share that fell 80% or more within 24 hours of our check, against coins without the signal. It describes past coins; it doesn't predict this one. All signals

The dev, the wallets that bought the launch block, and holders the dev funded: how they're connected and how their earlier coins did. The launch map below draws the connections.

3 of the wallets that bought this coin's launch block also bought the launch block of other coins we checked. Sniper bots and launch groups both look like this.

Other coins in our records tied to this creator through the wallet that first funded it.

The 20 biggest holders (bigger bubble = bigger share). Grey: pools and known services. Pink: wallets RugCheck flags as insiders. Same colour with a line to an outer dot: first funded by the same wallet. Liquidity locked: 79.3%.

Holders, insider flags, labels and liquidity locks: RugCheck. Shared funders: our own read of each wallet's first transaction.

The creator in the middle, the wallets that bought in the launch block around it (bigger bubble = bigger share of supply), and the wallets that funded them on the outside. Buyers with the same colour were funded by the same wallet.

Creator wallet 4LJtN34G7Enuo5YDbkAr8hi9qQ5AhiovSjhFLv7a8Dyu (from GeckoTerminal). We've checked 15 other coins from it:

• Checked isn't the same as safe: these checks describe what the token allows and what the website runs, not what anyone will do.
• "Nothing found" means not visible on the public page; servers and private code are invisible to us. Not financial advice.