JZ$JZCROWNnew$22.3M+22.7%NO$NOFTnew$171K+2.1%BO$BONnew$113K+106.0%$Gemininew$450K+986.0%$NAMInew$25.0K+163.0%$Polarnew$16.0K+88.9%$CHADnew$186K+2096.0%$ELON2028new$279K狮子$狮子座new$503K+177.0%$OIFnew$146K+2.4%$CHADnew$17.7K+94.7%$OCnew$28.9K+512.0%BR$BRAI🌟new$268K+93.7%KT$KTNnew$11.0K+40.2%TS$TSnew$22.7K+168.0%BN$BNB Standardnew$28.2K+39.0%SO$solananew$30.7K+254.0%BN$BNB Standardnew$48.6K+13.4%CH$CHADnew$23.9K+175.0%BT$BTWnew$10.1B+13498355669818.0%社群$社群人生new$1.5M+1789.0%NE$NEWnew$35.2K币安$币安好友new$28.7K+57.4%$Tauspdnew$75.0M+42.4%$CYBERCATnew$27.0K+165.0%BU$BUSHnew$35.2K💁‍$💁‍♀️new$845B+32028765788.0%TS$TSnew$16.5K+90.3%CH$CHADnew$46.7K+446.0%$PSAnew$37.7K+190.0%RE$RESOURCEnew$35.2KDS$DSPnew$41.7K+20.4%$VEIL$791K-39.3%$PAID$2.7M-8.7%$BATON$5.0M-9.2%$DARK$825K-13.8%$XTO$13.3M+8.9%$MISTAKE$109K-85.4%$HOOKED$995K-13.4%$E/ACC$405K-12.1%
Coin · Solana · graduated 1d ago

$LUCIA

26F538BLQfg4PwSPnMnYLekvvrBV12caDxEqVB8d6dRG

Receipts checked 25 Oct 2026
Green light85/100
Tech real? nothing to check Dev & team legit? can't tell yet Launch & holders: 90
Will it send? Of 1,040 earlier coins rated GREEN, 33% went 2x+ and 37% fell 80%+ within a day of our check. Past coins, not a prediction.
Why: 1 fact weigh against it
  • -10Only 0% of the liquidity is locked

No mint or freeze power left; 447 holders, top 10 hold 7%.

No control powers leftLaunch block 0%LP locked 0%Older coin, same ticker
  • Same ticker elsewhere29 other coins trade as $LUCIA. The biggest is Lucia on Solana ($295K, first pool 44d ago). It is older and bigger than this one, so check you have the address you meant.
The story behind it

@thegoat195923 verified · 0 likes · 1 replies

The actress of lucia said she isnt rich and needs money??? found her X sending her fees with paid ITS SITTING at 400k ON STONK WHICH IS DEAD https://t.co/Tt5ECKynNA https://t.co/95lyIePd0R

The post names this coin.

?Market cap $11.7KAt our check ?Since check ?Price 24h ?Volume 24h ?Liquidity 447Holders 7%Held by top 10 ?Since first pool ?Dev's coins checked

Market data from DexScreener (updates live while this page is open), holders from GeckoTerminal: third-party context, not part of the evidence.

Launch tape (log time from creation)

Created Launch block 0% · 0 wallets · +0s Graduated +3m Our check $11.7K · +3m 24 h later $0 · +24h Now +38h

Chart

Loading the chart…

    ▲ buy · ▼ sell · ● event. Markers show trades by wallets we know something about (the dev, launch-block buyers, crews, labelled wallets, large trades) and what our live watch flagged. Facts, not a verdict.

    At a glance

    • Control powers left0
    • Bought in the launch block0.0% by 0 wallets
    • Held by top 107%
    • Socialssite X Telegram

    Facts read from the chain and the coin's own pages. Checked isn't the same as safe.

    Live activity

    Connecting to the live trades…

    What we're seeing

    • Waiting for trades…

    Latest trades

    Most active wallets (in the trades we've read)

    WalletBoughtSoldNetTrades
    Waiting for trades…

    Trades from GeckoTerminal's public feed, refreshed every few seconds while this page is open. Wallet ages and funders: our own reads of each wallet's first transaction. Flags describe what happened, not why.

    Cross-checks

    What we find when we compare the coin's website, code, token, launch timing, liquidity, ticker and wallets against each other and against public address labels.

    • The story behind itThe coin's story is an X post by @thegoat195923 (verified) with 0 likes. The post names this coin. source
    • On-chain features in the codeThe site's code contains wallet or contract code. source
    • Same ticker elsewhere29 other coins trade as $LUCIA. The biggest is Lucia on Solana ($295K, first pool 44d ago). It is older and bigger than this one, so check you have the address you meant. source
    • Contract permissions (GoPlus)GoPlus finds none of the risky permissions it checks for. source
    • Reused Telegram groupThe Telegram group t.me/token is also listed by 118 other coins we checked: $1, $1, $MCP, $ETR…. So many coins list it that it's most likely someone else's, borrowed for the story. source
    • Reused websiteThe website usepaid.app is also listed by 154 other coins we checked: $PAID, $Hugo, $DICKBUTTIFIER, $DICKBUTIFI…. So many coins list it that it's most likely someone else's, borrowed for the story. source

    Track record of these signals

    How earlier coins with the same signals did: the share that fell 80% or more within 24 hours of our check, against coins without the signal. It describes past coins; it doesn't predict this one. All signals

    Signal this coin hasFell 80%+ with itWithout itCoins
    Liquidity not locked43%50%734

    The launch block

    0 wallets bought 0.0% of the supply in the same block the coin was created (or the next one). Many buyers there usually means a scripted, "bundled" launch.

    Holder map

    The 20 biggest holders (bigger bubble = bigger share). Grey: pools and known services. Pink: wallets RugCheck flags as insiders. Same colour with a line to an outer dot: first funded by the same wallet. Linked holders hold 3.09%. Liquidity locked: 0%.

    Holders, insider flags, labels and liquidity locks: RugCheck. Shared funders: our own read of each wallet's first transaction.

    The token

    0 control powers left

    • Mint new tokens: locked
    • Freeze wallets: locked
    • Change name, logo and links: locked
    Full token blueprint

    The website

    0 of None tech claims backed

    • Wallet connection: evidence found
    • Trading / swaps / bots: evidence found
    • Live data / analytics: evidence found
    Full website blueprint
    • Checked isn't the same as safe: these checks describe what the token allows and what the website runs, not what anyone will do.
    • "Nothing found" means not visible on the public page; servers and private code are invisible to us. Not financial advice.