FA$FANSLYnew$10.4K+14.9%CE$CEECILnew$34.7K+0.6%天秤$天秤座老🐸new$320K+67.9%AC$ACnew$11.2K+28.3%AC$ACnew$129K+1527.0%$Nothingnew$168K+4942.0%KI$Kimchinew$143K+24.1%GU$GURUnew$10.1K+187.0%US$USDPnew$3.5B+97.7%HY$HYNnew$11.5K$BNB Standanew$16.8K+253.0%$XTOnew$179M+426238.0%$NOMOnew$395K+754.0%$yoki酱new$16.0K+42.2%$XTOnew$110K+4.3%$BNB Standanew$35.3K+159.0%$NOMOnew$23.4K+392.0%IG$ignorenew$121K+1238.0%$███new$45.1K-6.0%SO$SONnew$24.3K+206.0%MM$MMCoinsnew$15.6K+33.6%NO$Nothingnew$58.9K+721.0%TA$Taynew$13.7K+60.8%$NOMOnew$14.8K+68.9%DO$DOMENnew$10.1KCA$catonpadnew$17.3K+97.7%NO$NOMOnew$51.8K+623.0%SO$SOJOnew$40.9K+242.0%SN$SNPnew$142K+51.0%$NFOTnew$92.3K+2.1%SK$SKH new$10.4K+32.0%KA$KANEnew$38.1K+186.0%$VEIL$1.1M-11.3%$PAID$2.5M-12.0%$BATON$5.4M-7.6%$DARK$896K+13.2%$XTO$14.4M+28.2%$MISTAKE$802K-12.4%$HOOKED$1.0M-10.7%$E/ACC$420K-1.4%
Coin · Solana · graduated 20h ago

$mem0x

21tHTG53PUSWs36p368Q4g2ZzobUCUgofqUPDcDoHuhh

Receipts checked 20 h ago
Red light20/100
Tech real? 5 Dev & team legit? can't tell yet Launch & holders: 80
Will it send? Of 107 earlier coins rated RED, 8% went 2x+ and 81% fell 80%+ within a day of our check. Past coins, not a prediction.
Why: 5 facts weigh against it
  • -70The website backs 0 of its 1 tech claims with its own code
  • -20Top 10 holders hold 78%
  • -10Website doesn't show this token's address receipt
  • -10AI claim, no AI calls seen receipt
  • -5Website age vs launch

Trading for 20h; no mint or freeze power left; 476 holders, top 10 hold 78%.

No control powers leftLaunch block 0%LP locked 100%20h old
  • Website doesn't show this token's addressThe token's address doesn't appear on its website or in the site's code; the site shows other addresses (9qav…pump).
  • AI claim, no AI calls seenThe site claims AI, but none of its pages called an AI service while we watched (it may run on its own servers).
  • Website age vs launchThe Internet Archive has never saved the site: it is probably as new as the coin.
?Market cap ?At our check ?Since check ?Price 24h ?Volume 24h ?Liquidity 476Holders 78%Held by top 10 20hSince first pool ?Dev's coins checked

Market data from DexScreener (updates live while this page is open), holders from GeckoTerminal: third-party context, not part of the evidence.

Launch tape (log time from creation)

Created Launch block 0% · 0 wallets · +0s Graduated +2m Our check +2m Now +21h
Loads DexScreener's chart in this page (their site sets its own cookies).

At a glance

  • Control powers left0
  • Bought in the launch block0.0% by 0 wallets
  • Held by top 1078%
  • Website tech claims backed0 of 1
  • Socialssite X

Facts read from the chain and the coin's own pages. Checked isn't the same as safe.

Live activity

Connecting to the live trades…

What we're seeing

  • Waiting for trades…

Latest trades

Most active wallets (in the trades we've read)

WalletBoughtSoldNetTrades
Waiting for trades…

Trades from GeckoTerminal's public feed, refreshed every few seconds while this page is open. Wallet ages and funders: our own reads of each wallet's first transaction. Flags describe what happened, not why.

Cross-checks

What we find when we compare the coin's website, code, token, launch timing, liquidity, ticker and wallets against each other and against public address labels.

  • Website doesn't show this token's addressThe token's address doesn't appear on its website or in the site's code; the site shows other addresses (9qav…pump). source
  • AI claim, no AI calls seenThe site claims AI, but none of its pages called an AI service while we watched (it may run on its own servers). source
  • Website age vs launchThe Internet Archive has never saved the site: it is probably as new as the coin.
  • Same ticker elsewhere24 other coins trade as $mem0x. The biggest is mem0x on Solana ($3.6B, first pool 20h ago). source
  • Contract permissions (GoPlus)GoPlus finds none of the risky permissions it checks for. source
  • Reused X accountThe X account @_mem0x is also listed by 8 other coins we checked: $MINAJ, $mem0x, $MEM0X, $mem0x…. So many coins list it that it's most likely someone else's, borrowed for the story. source
  • Reused websiteThe website mem0x.com is also listed by 8 other coins we checked: $MINAJ, $mem0x, $MEM0X, $mem0x…. So many coins list it that it's most likely someone else's, borrowed for the story. source

Track record of these signals

How earlier coins with the same signals did: the share that fell 80% or more within 24 hours of our check, against coins without the signal. It describes past coins; it doesn't predict this one. All signals

Signal this coin hasFell 80%+ with itWithout itCoins
Top 10 hold 50%+56%47%569
Website tech claims mostly unbackedcollecting49%9

The launch block

0 wallets bought 0.0% of the supply in the same block the coin was created (or the next one). Many buyers there usually means a scripted, "bundled" launch.

Holder map

The 20 biggest holders (bigger bubble = bigger share). Grey: pools and known services. Pink: wallets RugCheck flags as insiders. Same colour with a line to an outer dot: first funded by the same wallet. Liquidity locked: 100%.

Holders, insider flags, labels and liquidity locks: RugCheck. Shared funders: our own read of each wallet's first transaction.

The token

0 control powers left

  • Mint new tokens: locked
  • Freeze wallets: locked
  • Change name, logo and links: locked
Full token blueprint

The website

0 of 1 tech claims backed

  • AI / agents: nothing found on the public page
Full website blueprint
  • Checked isn't the same as safe: these checks describe what the token allows and what the website runs, not what anyone will do.
  • "Nothing found" means not visible on the public page; servers and private code are invisible to us. Not financial advice.