$Gemininew
$OPENAInew
$bibinew
$GTAnew
$OInew
$Jenmusenew
$Bvcrabnew
$Robinhoodnew
$LUCYnew
$Nyxnew
$LUMINAnew
$SDSIRENnew
$Groknew
$VEIL
$PAID
$BATON
$DARK
$XTO
$MISTAKE
$HOOKED
$E/ACC$RAID
RaidLords
21MZFPZMRNuti2TU4ba6kV7NGjYvBcBk94muhAdA53Ep
Trading for 3h; no mint or freeze power left; 13 holders, top 10 hold 0%.
- Website doesn't show this token's addressThe token's address doesn't appear on its website or in the site's code; the site shows other addresses (0x83…0951, 0x20…0498, 0x8d…8f94).
- Liquidity depthPool liquidity is $2, 0.1% of the $2.7K market cap. Selling 1% of the supply (about $27) would get roughly 96.0% less than the quoted price (estimate for a standard pool).
Market data from DexScreener (updates live while this page is open), holders from GeckoTerminal: third-party context, not part of the evidence.
Launch tape (log time from creation)
At a glance
- Control powers left0
- Bought in the launch block0.0% by 0 wallets
- Held by top 100%
- Website tech claims backed1 of 1
- Socialssite X
Facts read from the chain and the coin's own pages. Checked isn't the same as safe.
Live activity
What we're seeing
- Waiting for trades…
Latest trades
Most active wallets (in the trades we've read)
| Wallet | Bought | Sold | Net | Trades | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Waiting for trades… | |||||
Trades from GeckoTerminal's public feed, refreshed every few seconds while this page is open. Wallet ages and funders: our own reads of each wallet's first transaction. Flags describe what happened, not why.
Cross-checks
What we find when we compare the coin's website, code, token, launch timing, liquidity, ticker and wallets against each other and against public address labels.
- Website doesn't show this token's addressThe token's address doesn't appear on its website or in the site's code; the site shows other addresses (0x83…0951, 0x20…0498, 0x8d…8f94). source
- On-chain features in the codeThe site's code contains wallet or contract code. source
- Liquidity depthPool liquidity is $2, 0.1% of the $2.7K market cap. Selling 1% of the supply (about $27) would get roughly 96.0% less than the quoted price (estimate for a standard pool). source
- Same ticker elsewhere29 other coins trade as $RAID. The biggest is RaidLords on Robinhood Chain ($401K, first pool 14h ago). source
- Contract permissions (GoPlus)GoPlus finds none of the risky permissions it checks for. source
Track record of these signals
How earlier coins with the same signals did: the share that fell 80% or more within 24 hours of our check, against coins without the signal. It describes past coins; it doesn't predict this one. All signals
| Signal this coin has | Fell 80%+ with it | Without it | Coins |
|---|---|---|---|
| Liquidity not locked | 42% | 50% | 599 |
The launch block
0 wallets bought 0.0% of the supply in the same block the coin was created (or the next one). Many buyers there usually means a scripted, "bundled" launch.
Holder map
The 20 biggest holders (bigger bubble = bigger share). Grey: pools and known services. Pink: wallets RugCheck flags as insiders. Same colour with a line to an outer dot: first funded by the same wallet. Liquidity locked: 0%.
Holders, insider flags, labels and liquidity locks: RugCheck. Shared funders: our own read of each wallet's first transaction.
The token
0 control powers left
- Mint new tokens: locked
- Freeze wallets: locked
- Change name, logo and links: locked
- Checked isn't the same as safe: these checks describe what the token allows and what the website runs, not what anyone will do.
- "Nothing found" means not visible on the public page; servers and private code are invisible to us. Not financial advice.