SU$Sunnew$14.2K+62.9%$Sunnew$146K+1606.0%PU$pumpcatnew$59.6K+14.7%$MINEnew$16.8K+28.0%$KWIFnew$270K+210.0%$MESHnew$29.9K+67.8%PA$PAKInew$41.3K+1281.0%$AOPnew$54.1M+128500.0%$GTA6new$16.3K+23.0%$DACATnew$229K+163.0%NO$Nothingnew$87.1K+54.1%$ABACKEYnew$94.3K+45.4%$PCATnew$252K+189.0%PU$pumpcatnew$155K+1619.0%PU$pumpcatnew$14.9K+73.0%PU$pumpcatnew$30.5K+245.0%GI$Giraffedognew$41.2K+1194.0%$姆巴佩·毛泽东new$25.1K+18.8%$Koyurinew$59.8K+554.0%$DAWGnew$227K+162.0%$LAUNCHnew$22.5K+348.0%KO$Koyurinew$68.9K+1269.0%MI$MINGMINGnew$28.8K+219.0%$Koyurinew$118K+1286.0%KO$Koyurinew$11.0K+28.0%$佩狗new$19.5K+53.0%$GTAnew$247K+184.0%$HUSHnew$355K+308.0%$Koyurinew$83.1K+729.0%KO$Koyurinew$10.5K+88.8%MA$Maggienew$41.0K+1243.0%$MCPnew$241K+178.0%$VEIL$780K-37.7%$PAID$2.6M-6.6%$BATON$5.4M-7.9%$DARK$823K-12.2%$XTO$13.5M+11.9%$MISTAKE$61.1K-91.6%$HOOKED$1.1M-2.6%$E/ACC$408K-6.8%
Contract blueprint · 11 h ago

SPACEX on Base

0xd67c2ee01d5a51ddbd0312cd6d080524bf99c453

Template-written 5 evidence items REA inspect-evm-interface (in WSL)
What this means for you

SPACEX on Base: no owner switches found among its 9 functions.E2E5

  • The contract has no owner() function, so there's no single owner wallet to check.E5

What it is

  • It's a token called SpaceX (SPACEX).E3
  • Total supply: 5,600,000,000 tokens.E4
  • We read 9 functions from its public code with REA inspect-evm-interface (in WSL).E2E1

What the owner can do

No functions match known owner powers (mint, pause, block wallets, change fees or limits, open/close trading, replace the code).E2

Chain
Base
Address
0xd67c2ee01d5a51ddbd0312cd6d080524bf99c453
Token
SpaceX (SPACEX)
Supply
5,600,000,000 tokens
Owner
no owner() function
Engine
REA inspect-evm-interface (in WSL)
All 9 functions
name()approve(address,uint256) · nonpayabletotalSupply()transferFrom(address,address,uint256) · nonpayabledecimals()balanceOf(address)symbol()transfer(address,uint256) · nonpayableallowance(address,address)

Evidence

Every sentence above points to one of these. Code references show the file, line:column and the short identifier that matched, never the site's code itself.

E1
3,553 bytes of contract code on Base
eth_getCode on Base · 0xd67c2ee01d5a51ddbd0312cd6d080524bf99c453 · sha256 2b6f2df61d59183b…
E2
9 functions extracted with REA inspect-evm-interface (in WSL)
Base bytecode 0xd67c2ee0… · “9 selectors” · REA inspect-evm-interface (in WSL)
E3
Token name/symbol: SpaceX (SPACEX)
eth_call name() / symbol() on Base · 0xd67c2ee01d5a51ddbd0312cd6d080524bf99c453
E4
Total supply: 5,600,000,000 tokens
eth_call totalSupply() / decimals() on Base · 0xd67c2ee01d5a51ddbd0312cd6d080524bf99c453
E5
No owner() function in the contract
Base bytecode · “no 0x8da5cb5b selector” · REA inspect-evm-interface (in WSL)

Limits

  • Powers are read from the contract's function list. A power hidden behind an unnamed function can't be explained, only counted.
  • Who holds a power is only checked through owner(). Roles, multisigs and proxy admins may hold powers too.
  • This describes what the code allows, not what anyone will do. It isn't financial advice.
  • This text was written from fixed templates because no AI writer was available. It uses exactly the same evidence.

Facts, not judgements: this page describes what the code and traffic show, not anyone's intent. Not financial advice. Case id nqVT9vGJ.