ET$ETBLADEnew$10.9K+367.0%SH$Shitpostingnew$38.5K+456.0%QF$Qforknew$37.7K+8.6%$BNB Standanew$11.9K+150.0%$TPFALCNnew$72.8K+37.9%$.AiTownnew$19.3K+8.1%RE$Replicanew$31.9K+344.0%NO$Nothingnew$31.3K+162.0%RO$ROBInew$11.6K+0.0%GA$GANGnew$413K+141.0%$BNB Standanew$31.8K+134.0%$Nothingnew$24.6K+416.0%$ASQUADnew$17.0K+85.8%CA$CALLDEXnew$50.0K+214.0%SH$Shitpostingnew$11.5K+66.2%SO$SOLVETnew$23.3K+152.0%$MEOWVINCInew$39.9K+179.0%$PETERnew$16.8K+66.8%OP$Opusnew$25.7K+223.0%KA$KANEnew$14.7K+62.0%$KANEnew$38.5K-19.0%MU$MUT8new$137K+45.8%$Nothingnew$20.1K+121.0%OP$Opusnew$37.9K+377.0%VC$VCSEnew$20.0K+-0.0%GO$GOOGLcnew$31.1K+67.6%$SEALLISnew$69.4K+70.4%$NEX Ainew$38.4K+86.9%$Shzgoatnew$99.0K+39.4%ME$MEMEMANnew$59.4K+727.0%PE$PETERnew$44.2K+269.0%$MCPMnew$50.0K$VEIL$1.1M-12.1%$PAID$2.5M-18.1%$BATON$5.7M+2.9%$DARK$952K+14.7%$XTO$14.7M+33.9%$MISTAKE$799K-16.8%$HOOKED$1.1M-2.4%$E/ACC$420K-2.1%
Contract blueprint · 1 h ago

SPCX on Base

0x220e2d977f3749315d2bfa01fb00206190b578c3

Template-written 5 evidence items REA inspect-evm-interface (in WSL)
What this means for you

SPCX on Base: no owner switches found among its 9 functions.E2E5

  • The contract has no owner() function, so there's no single owner wallet to check.E5

What it is

  • It's a token called SpaceX (SPCX).E3
  • Total supply: 5,600,000,000 tokens.E4
  • We read 9 functions from its public code with REA inspect-evm-interface (in WSL).E2E1

What the owner can do

No functions match known owner powers (mint, pause, block wallets, change fees or limits, open/close trading, replace the code).E2

Chain
Base
Address
0x220e2d977f3749315d2bfa01fb00206190b578c3
Token
SpaceX (SPCX)
Supply
5,600,000,000 tokens
Owner
no owner() function
Engine
REA inspect-evm-interface (in WSL)
All 9 functions
name()approve(address,uint256) · nonpayabletotalSupply()transferFrom(address,address,uint256) · nonpayabledecimals()balanceOf(address)symbol()transfer(address,uint256) · nonpayableallowance(address,address)

Evidence

Every sentence above points to one of these. Code references show the file, line:column and the short identifier that matched, never the site's code itself.

E1
3,553 bytes of contract code on Base
eth_getCode on Base · 0x220e2d977f3749315d2bfa01fb00206190b578c3 · sha256 2b6f2df61d59183b…
E2
9 functions extracted with REA inspect-evm-interface (in WSL)
Base bytecode 0x220e2d97… · “9 selectors” · REA inspect-evm-interface (in WSL)
E3
Token name/symbol: SpaceX (SPCX)
eth_call name() / symbol() on Base · 0x220e2d977f3749315d2bfa01fb00206190b578c3
E4
Total supply: 5,600,000,000 tokens
eth_call totalSupply() / decimals() on Base · 0x220e2d977f3749315d2bfa01fb00206190b578c3
E5
No owner() function in the contract
Base bytecode · “no 0x8da5cb5b selector” · REA inspect-evm-interface (in WSL)

Limits

  • Powers are read from the contract's function list. A power hidden behind an unnamed function can't be explained, only counted.
  • Who holds a power is only checked through owner(). Roles, multisigs and proxy admins may hold powers too.
  • This describes what the code allows, not what anyone will do. It isn't financial advice.
  • This text was written from fixed templates because no AI writer was available. It uses exactly the same evidence.

Facts, not judgements: this page describes what the code and traffic show, not anyone's intent. Not financial advice. Case id dFrYIp98.