trenchcoat Check a coin
DI$DICTATORnew$12.3K+34.6%BA$BAHnew$10.0K+0.0%ME$MERCURYnew$35.5K+2.5%DO$Dodonew$15.9K+82.9%$MEGHOSTnew$79.9M+43.7%FI$FInew$18.2K+107.0%$INFLXnew$10.1K7A$7AGENTnew$95.0K+71.3%MM$MMGAnew$84.4K+861.0%FI$FInew$11.8K+34.1%EC$ECORnew$34.6K$GIGABTCnew$41.1K+1368.0%$TRUMP2028new$31.8K+45.4%$SEALnew$88.9K+945.0%$MEGAnew$71.9K+42.9%$DBLOBnew$32.5K+149.0%$罗小黑new$21.6K+75.5%$Dmgobnew$27.6M+46.2%PA$PADnew$153K+561.0%SP$SPACEnew$34.6KPU$PUMPMOREnew$13.3K+50.1%$DBLOBnew$19.3K+47.9%$大Anew$25.2K+286.0%$OGPADnew$50.1K+524.0%$咯咯new$33.7K+70.2%$fomonew$155K+273.0%LA$LAUNCHnew$126K+125.0%MA$MAOPPEnew$72.0K+1119.0%$BEASTnew$720K+1633.0%$JAKCOINnew$41.1K+1368.0%MO$MONAnew$34.6KBE$BETAnew$35.3K$VEIL$790K-36.4%$PAID$2.6M-7.3%$BATON$5.3M-4.3%$DARK$814K-8.3%$XTO$13.3M+13.9%$MISTAKE$124K-83.1%$HOOKED$1.0M-10.0%$E/ACC$399K-11.4%
Contract blueprint · 13 h ago

UTDF on Base

0xdd47db7639c616241f433958bcb8664467640080

Template-written 8 evidence items REA inspect-evm-interface (in WSL)
What this means for you

UTDF on Base: the code has 1 control switch that can still be used.E7E5E6

  • Replace the code: Can swap the contract's code for new code (upgradeable proxy), which can change any rule.E7E5E6
  • The contract has no owner() function, so there's no single owner wallet to check.E5
  • It's a minimal proxy (clone) that points to fixed code.E6
  • 10 functions that change state have no public name, so we can't say what they do.E8

What it is

  • It's a token called UTDF (UTDF).E3
  • Total supply: 1,000,000,000 tokens.E4
  • Besides the standard token functions it has supportsInterface, DOMAIN_SEPARATOR, tokenURI, burn, nonces, eip712Domain, permit, currency and 1 more.E2
  • We read 45 functions from its public code with REA inspect-evm-interface (in WSL).E2E1

What the owner can do

Replace the code

can be used

Can swap the contract's code for new code (upgradeable proxy), which can change any rule.E7E5E6

EIP-1167 minimal proxy (clone, not upgradeable)

10 state-changing functions have no public name: 0x173825d9 0x2b968958 0x46bb5954 0x5a446215 0x6c46a2c5 0x7065cb48 0x7a3b5a23 0x938e3d7b E8

Chain
Base
Address
0xdd47db7639c616241f433958bcb8664467640080
Token
UTDF (UTDF)
Supply
1,000,000,000 tokens
Owner
no owner() function
Proxy
EIP-1167 minimal proxy (clone, not upgradeable) → 0x5dbd43785954d43c1643a0caf2ecef9e0056ff13
Engine
REA inspect-evm-interface (in WSL)
All 45 functions
supportsInterface(bytes4)name()approve(address,uint256) · nonpayable0x173825d9(address) · nonpayabletotalSupply()0x187446c8()0x1fe93ea8()transferFrom(address,address,uint256) · nonpayable0x29df6479()0x2b968958() · nonpayable0x2f54bf6e(address)decimals()0x346a21dc()DOMAIN_SEPARATOR()tokenURI()0x3e280d53()0x3fb80b15()burn(uint256) · nonpayable0x46bb5954(address) · nonpayable0x51845bf6()0x5a446215(bytes,bytes) · nonpayable0x683e76e0()0x6c46a2c5(address[]) · nonpayable0x7065cb48(address) · nonpayablebalanceOf(address)0x7a3b5a23(address,bytes) · nonpayablenonces(address)eip712Domain()0x938e3d7b(bytes) · nonpayablesymbol()0xa0a8e460()transfer(address,uint256) · nonpayable0xa9a5e3af(address[]) · nonpayable0xaffe39c1()0xb80945e9()0xcd7033c4()permit(address,address,uint256,uint256,uint8,bytes32,bytes32) · nonpayable0xdc4c90d3()0xdd0371d5(address,address[],bytes,bytes,bytes,address,address,address,address,uint24,int24,address,address,(uint8,uint16,uint24,int24,uint16[],int24[],int24[],uint256[])) · nonpayableallowance(address,address)currency()contractURI()0xf3ffe14b(address)0xf53eab8e()0xf78a8a3e()

Evidence

Every sentence above points to one of these. Code references show the file, line:column and the short identifier that matched, never the site's code itself.

E1
45 bytes of contract code on Base
eth_getCode on Base · 0xdd47db7639c616241f433958bcb8664467640080 · sha256 82e5603e0326fbcb…
E2
45 functions extracted with REA inspect-evm-interface (in WSL)
Base bytecode 0xdd47db76… · “45 selectors” · REA inspect-evm-interface (in WSL)
E3
Token name/symbol: UTDF (UTDF)
eth_call name() / symbol() on Base · 0xdd47db7639c616241f433958bcb8664467640080
E4
Total supply: 1,000,000,000 tokens
eth_call totalSupply() / decimals() on Base · 0xdd47db7639c616241f433958bcb8664467640080
E5
No owner() function in the contract
Base bytecode · “no 0x8da5cb5b selector” · REA inspect-evm-interface (in WSL)
E6
EIP-1167 minimal proxy (clone, not upgradeable); implementation 0x5dbd43785954d43c1643a0caf2ecef9e0056ff13
eth_getStorageAt (proxy slots) on Base · 0xdd47db7639c616241f433958bcb8664467640080 · admin unknown
E7
Owner switch 'Replace the code': EIP-1167 minimal proxy (clone, not upgradeable)
Can swap the contract's code for new code (upgradeable proxy), which can change any rule.
Base bytecode 0xdd47db76… · “EIP-1167 minimal proxy (clone, not upgradeable)” · REA inspect-evm-interface (in WSL)
E8
10 state-changing function(s) with no public name
Base bytecode · “0x173825d9, 0x2b968958, 0x46bb5954, 0x5a446215” · REA inspect-evm-interface (in WSL)

Limits

  • Powers are read from the contract's function list. A power hidden behind an unnamed function can't be explained, only counted.
  • Who holds a power is only checked through owner(). Roles, multisigs and proxy admins may hold powers too.
  • This describes what the code allows, not what anyone will do. It isn't financial advice.
  • This text was written from fixed templates because no AI writer was available. It uses exactly the same evidence.

Facts, not judgements: this page describes what the code and traffic show, not anyone's intent. Not financial advice. Case id chxzJE64.