$Frongusnew$17.7K+271.0%FR$Frongusnew$50.3K+214.0%$NVIDIAnew$109K+159.0%$LMAOTITSnew$20.2K+98.6%$LMAOTITSnew$53.3K+289.0%CA$CASHnew$23.4K+13.6%IL$ILLOnew$21.8K+6.6%$PARTnew$132K+0.2%$CHIPnew$127K+0.2%$‮SUGNORFnew$2.0M+17.5%$Frednew$20.9K+126.0%$REBATEnew$335K+443.0%IN$INVERSEnew$57.1K+683.0%FR$Frongusnew$48.1K+559.0%ST$Stonkznew$46.0K+279.0%RA$RAIDnew$29.0K+23.3%$CZnew$30.0K+119.0%$Frednew$125K+812.0%RI$RIC🪙new$338K+110.0%FI$fihnew$23.5K+169.0%BA$BACKEDnew$16.8K+92.2%$EMTnew$115K+0.2%TE$Tethernew$956K+0.0%TH$THINKGUYnew$177K+655.0%CZ$CZnew$51.3K+555.0%佩佩$佩佩new$27.9K+52.8%$Frednew$59.8K+257.0%BN$BNUTnew$14.8K+518.0%$OMGnew$104K+0.2%社群$社群人生new$29.5K+45.1%PR$PRINCESSnew$119K+1360.0%$PRINCESSnew$100K+986.0%$VEIL$760K-32.1%$PAID$2.5M-1.6%$BATON$6.0M+10.0%$DARK$819K-7.5%$XTO$13.9M-0.1%$HOOKED$1.5M+42.2%$E/ACC$423K+3.5%$AGENCY$445K-0.6%
Contract blueprint · 16 h ago

AGI on BNB Chain

0xbd258d82ff03ca3021779b187a3463449ac9177a

Template-written 5 evidence items REA inspect-evm-interface (in WSL)
What this means for you

AGI on BNB Chain: no owner switches found among its 10 functions.E2E5

  • The contract has no owner() function, so there's no single owner wallet to check.E5

What it is

  • It's a token called A Gangstar Inu (AGI).E3
  • Total supply: 1,000,000,000 tokens.E4
  • Besides the standard token functions it has tokenURI.E2
  • We read 10 functions from its public code with REA inspect-evm-interface (in WSL).E2E1

What the owner can do

No functions match known owner powers (mint, pause, block wallets, change fees or limits, open/close trading, replace the code).E2

Chain
BNB Chain
Address
0xbd258d82ff03ca3021779b187a3463449ac9177a
Token
A Gangstar Inu (AGI)
Supply
1,000,000,000 tokens
Owner
no owner() function
Engine
REA inspect-evm-interface (in WSL)
All 10 functions
name()approve(address,uint256) · nonpayabletotalSupply()transferFrom(address,address,uint256) · nonpayabledecimals()tokenURI()balanceOf(address)symbol()transfer(address,uint256) · nonpayableallowance(address,address)

Evidence

Every sentence above points to one of these. Code references show the file, line:column and the short identifier that matched, never the site's code itself.

E1
1,526 bytes of contract code on BNB Chain
eth_getCode on BNB Chain · 0xbd258d82ff03ca3021779b187a3463449ac9177a · sha256 2492b571de4e7c70…
E2
10 functions extracted with REA inspect-evm-interface (in WSL)
BNB Chain bytecode 0xbd258d82… · “10 selectors” · REA inspect-evm-interface (in WSL)
E3
Token name/symbol: A Gangstar Inu (AGI)
eth_call name() / symbol() on BNB Chain · 0xbd258d82ff03ca3021779b187a3463449ac9177a
E4
Total supply: 1,000,000,000 tokens
eth_call totalSupply() / decimals() on BNB Chain · 0xbd258d82ff03ca3021779b187a3463449ac9177a
E5
No owner() function in the contract
BNB Chain bytecode · “no 0x8da5cb5b selector” · REA inspect-evm-interface (in WSL)

Limits

  • Powers are read from the contract's function list. A power hidden behind an unnamed function can't be explained, only counted.
  • Who holds a power is only checked through owner(). Roles, multisigs and proxy admins may hold powers too.
  • This describes what the code allows, not what anyone will do. It isn't financial advice.
  • This text was written from fixed templates because no AI writer was available. It uses exactly the same evidence.

Facts, not judgements: this page describes what the code and traffic show, not anyone's intent. Not financial advice. Case id c9q6C6yx.