WE$weenunew$11.1K+27.4%LI$LILYnew$10.3K+17.6%$UOTFnew$2.4M+0.4%BT$BTWnew$2.1B+2789685055968.0%GI$GIGATENEVnew$19.6K+4.0%ME$memenew$20.4K+121.0%ME$memenew$21.7K+150.0%$BNCInew$11.7K+145.0%IN$INVERSEnew$41.7K+243.0%$Claudenew$137K+226.0%💯D$💯DIAMnew$541K+180.0%GO$Googlenew$24.3K+19.6%ME$MEMEnew$25.0K+185.0%HE$HENOSISnew$24.8K+169.0%ME$memenew$26.5K+248.0%$APDnew$136K+1.4%$SDOGnew$10.1K+9.5%$#84732new$81.2K+781.0%$INVERSEnew$195K+5660.0%ST$StonkPaynew$20.8K+136.0%中本$中本聪new$26.8K+45.8%$FOTFnew$1.4M+0.6%IN$INGUSnew$17.6K+131.0%DE$DEVnew$11.8KBT$BTCnew$133K+39.8%$ADPnew$126K+1.5%LE$LEAFPEEPERnew$10.8K+156.0%BT$BTWnew$11.4B+14921004725873.0%PO$PONKnew$15.8K+108.0%$APDnew$114K+1.7%IN$INVERSEnew$61.0K+735.0%FR$Frongusnew$49.7K+580.0%$VEIL$719K-36.0%$PAID$2.5M-1.0%$BATON$6.1M+7.4%$DARK$713K-24.9%$XTO$13.1M-10.7%$MISTAKE$11.5K-98.6%$HOOKED$1.3M+27.9%$E/ACC$418K-2.0%
Contract blueprint · 9 h ago

Starman on Base

0xbcebe61b6ab5c9e7882d6ccd5869f02f4ccb330d

Template-written 5 evidence items REA inspect-evm-interface (in WSL)
What this means for you

Starman on Base: no owner switches found among its 10 functions.E2E5

  • The contract has no owner() function, so there's no single owner wallet to check.E5

What it is

  • It's a token called Roadster Starman (Starman).E3
  • Total supply: 1,000,000,000 tokens.E4
  • Besides the standard token functions it has tokenURI.E2
  • We read 10 functions from its public code with REA inspect-evm-interface (in WSL).E2E1

What the owner can do

No functions match known owner powers (mint, pause, block wallets, change fees or limits, open/close trading, replace the code).E2

Chain
Base
Address
0xbcebe61b6ab5c9e7882d6ccd5869f02f4ccb330d
Token
Roadster Starman (Starman)
Supply
1,000,000,000 tokens
Owner
no owner() function
Engine
REA inspect-evm-interface (in WSL)
All 10 functions
name()approve(address,uint256) · nonpayabletotalSupply()transferFrom(address,address,uint256) · nonpayabledecimals()tokenURI()balanceOf(address)symbol()transfer(address,uint256) · nonpayableallowance(address,address)

Evidence

Every sentence above points to one of these. Code references show the file, line:column and the short identifier that matched, never the site's code itself.

E1
1,627 bytes of contract code on Base
eth_getCode on Base · 0xbcebe61b6ab5c9e7882d6ccd5869f02f4ccb330d · sha256 85ce8d3dafc1735f…
E2
10 functions extracted with REA inspect-evm-interface (in WSL)
Base bytecode 0xbcebe61b… · “10 selectors” · REA inspect-evm-interface (in WSL)
E3
Token name/symbol: Roadster Starman (Starman)
eth_call name() / symbol() on Base · 0xbcebe61b6ab5c9e7882d6ccd5869f02f4ccb330d
E4
Total supply: 1,000,000,000 tokens
eth_call totalSupply() / decimals() on Base · 0xbcebe61b6ab5c9e7882d6ccd5869f02f4ccb330d
E5
No owner() function in the contract
Base bytecode · “no 0x8da5cb5b selector” · REA inspect-evm-interface (in WSL)

Limits

  • Powers are read from the contract's function list. A power hidden behind an unnamed function can't be explained, only counted.
  • Who holds a power is only checked through owner(). Roles, multisigs and proxy admins may hold powers too.
  • This describes what the code allows, not what anyone will do. It isn't financial advice.
  • This text was written from fixed templates because no AI writer was available. It uses exactly the same evidence.

Facts, not judgements: this page describes what the code and traffic show, not anyone's intent. Not financial advice. Case id RXGuSGiY.