Contract blueprint · 15 h ago

ZORA on Base

0x1111111111166b7fe7bd91427724b487980afc69

Template-written 6 evidence items REA inspect-evm-interface (in WSL)

What this means for you

ZORA on Base: no owner switches found among its 25 functions.E2 E5

The contract has no owner() function, so there's no single owner wallet to check.E5
2 functions that change state have no public name, so we can't say what they do.E6

What it is

It's a token called Zora (ZORA).E3
Total supply: 10,000,000,000 tokens.E4
Besides the standard token functions it has DOMAIN_SEPARATOR, CLOCK_MODE, delegates, delegate, numCheckpoints, nonces, eip712Domain, clock and 3 more.E2
We read 25 functions from its public code with REA inspect-evm-interface (in WSL).E2 E1

What the owner can do

No functions match known owner powers (mint, pause, block wallets, change fees or limits, open/close trading, replace the code).E2

2 state-changing functions have no public name: 0x7c3d85f9 0xc3cda520 E6

Chain: Base
Address: 0x1111111111166b7fe7bd91427724b487980afc69
Token: Zora (ZORA)
Supply: 10,000,000,000 tokens
Owner: no owner() function
Engine: REA inspect-evm-interface (in WSL)

All 25 functions

name()approve(address,uint256) · nonpayabletotalSupply()transferFrom(address,address,uint256) · nonpayabledecimals()DOMAIN_SEPARATOR()0x3a46b1a8(address,uint256)CLOCK_MODE()delegates(address)delegate(address) · nonpayablenumCheckpoints(address)balanceOf(address)0x7c3d85f9(uint256[],uint256[],bytes) · nonpayablenonces(address)eip712Domain()0x8e539e8c(uint256)clock()symbol()getVotes(address)transfer(address,uint256) · nonpayable0xc3cda520(address,uint256,uint256,uint8,uint256,uint256) · nonpayablepermit(address,address,uint256,uint256,uint8,bytes32,bytes32) · nonpayableallowance(address,address)contractURI()0xf1127ed8(address,uint32)

Evidence

Every sentence above points to one of these. Code references show the file, line:column and the short identifier that matched, never the site's code itself.

12,018 bytes of contract code on Base

eth_getCode on Base · 0x1111111111166b7fe7bd91427724b487980afc69 · sha256 ccf9abbf3f22634f…

25 functions extracted with REA inspect-evm-interface (in WSL)

Base bytecode 0x11111111… · “25 selectors” · REA inspect-evm-interface (in WSL)

Token name/symbol: Zora (ZORA)

eth_call name() / symbol() on Base · 0x1111111111166b7fe7bd91427724b487980afc69

Total supply: 10,000,000,000 tokens

eth_call totalSupply() / decimals() on Base · 0x1111111111166b7fe7bd91427724b487980afc69

No owner() function in the contract

Base bytecode · “no 0x8da5cb5b selector” · REA inspect-evm-interface (in WSL)

2 state-changing function(s) with no public name

Base bytecode · “0x7c3d85f9, 0xc3cda520” · REA inspect-evm-interface (in WSL)

Limits

Powers are read from the contract's function list. A power hidden behind an unnamed function can't be explained, only counted.
Who holds a power is only checked through owner(). Roles, multisigs and proxy admins may hold powers too.
This describes what the code allows, not what anyone will do. It isn't financial advice.
This text was written from fixed templates because no AI writer was available. It uses exactly the same evidence.

Facts, not judgements: this page describes what the code and traffic show, not anyone's intent. Not financial advice. Case id MqBcrzt9.