Contract blueprint · 5 h ago
BI on Base
0x648cfc171fc6182e215fd72f8587a05230bf5b07
What it is
- It's a token called Base Inu (BI).E3
- Total supply: 100,000,000,000 tokens.E4
- Besides the standard token functions it has supportsInterface, DOMAIN_SEPARATOR, metadata, burn, CLOCK_MODE, delegates, delegate, numCheckpoints and 7 more.E2
- We read 39 functions from its public code with REA inspect-evm-interface (in WSL).E2E1
What the owner can do
No functions match known owner powers (mint, pause, block wallets, change fees or limits, open/close trading, replace the code).E2
7 state-changing functions have no public name: 0x18bf5077 0x2b8c49e3 0x918b5be1 0xc3cda520 0xe2f273bd 0xeb3d68e7 0xfc735e99 E6
- Chain
- Base
- Address
- 0x648cfc171fc6182e215fd72f8587a05230bf5b07
- Token
- Base Inu (BI)
- Supply
- 100,000,000,000 tokens
- Owner
- no owner() function
- Engine
- REA inspect-evm-interface (in WSL)
All 39 functions
supportsInterface(bytes4)name()approve(address,uint256) · nonpayabletotalSupply()0x18bf5077(address,uint256) · nonpayable0x1c7b2ff4()transferFrom(address,address,uint256) · nonpayable0x2b8c49e3(address,uint256) · nonpayabledecimals()DOMAIN_SEPARATOR()metadata()0x3a46b1a8(address,uint256)burn(uint256) · nonpayableCLOCK_MODE()delegates(address)delegate(address) · nonpayablenumCheckpoints(address)balanceOf(address)burnFrom(address,uint256) · nonpayablenonces(address)0x80007e83()eip712Domain()0x8e539e8c(uint256)0x918b5be1(string) · nonpayableclock()symbol()getVotes(address)transfer(address,uint256) · nonpayable0xaba83150()0xb974b0a3()0xc3cda520(address,uint256,uint256,uint8,uint256,uint256) · nonpayable0xd0496d6a()permit(address,address,uint256,uint256,uint8,bytes32,bytes32) · nonpayableallowance(address,address)0xe2f273bd(address) · nonpayable0xeb3d68e7(string) · nonpayable0xf1127ed8(address,uint32)admin()0xfc735e99() · nonpayableEvidence
Every sentence above points to one of these. Code references show the file, line:column and the short identifier that matched, never the site's code itself.
E1
12,791 bytes of contract code on Base
eth_getCode on Base · 0x648cfc171fc6182e215fd72f8587a05230bf5b07 · sha256 a01570ddf5f69146…
E2
39 functions extracted with REA inspect-evm-interface (in WSL)
Base bytecode 0x648cfc17… · “39 selectors” · REA inspect-evm-interface (in WSL)
E3
Token name/symbol: Base Inu (BI)
eth_call name() / symbol() on Base · 0x648cfc171fc6182e215fd72f8587a05230bf5b07
E4
Total supply: 100,000,000,000 tokens
eth_call totalSupply() / decimals() on Base · 0x648cfc171fc6182e215fd72f8587a05230bf5b07
E5
No owner() function in the contract
Base bytecode · “no 0x8da5cb5b selector” · REA inspect-evm-interface (in WSL)
E6
7 state-changing function(s) with no public name
Base bytecode · “0x18bf5077, 0x2b8c49e3, 0x918b5be1, 0xc3cda520” · REA inspect-evm-interface (in WSL)
Limits
- Powers are read from the contract's function list. A power hidden behind an unnamed function can't be explained, only counted.
- Who holds a power is only checked through owner(). Roles, multisigs and proxy admins may hold powers too.
- This describes what the code allows, not what anyone will do. It isn't financial advice.
- This text was written from fixed templates because no AI writer was available. It uses exactly the same evidence.
Facts, not judgements: this page describes what the code and traffic show, not anyone's intent. Not financial advice. Case id HmgSSNFx.