www.courthousebrief.com
“Aguilar v. Baton Corporation Ltd. d/b/a Pump.Fun — Document #129 | Court Brief”
Tech check
What the site says about itself, next to what its public page actually loads. Facts only, no verdict: you decide.
The page doesn't make tech claims we check for (AI, on-chain, wallets, trading, own chain, staking, live data, an app).
What loads is a page only: no own backend calls, wallet code, contract calls, AI services or live connections.E5
What it is
Where your data goes
On a first visit the page only talked to its own servers (www.courthousebrief.com).
Pages and API calls
Pages it links to
/index.html/courtbrief-document.pdfEvidence
Every sentence above points to one of these. Code references show the file, line:column and the short identifier that matched, never the site's code itself.
Limits
- We only see what your browser sees: code and requests on a first visit, without logging in or accepting cookie banners. What the servers do with data is invisible from outside.
- Site code is usually minified (compressed), so names are partly lost and some code may be only partly analysed.
- Some trackers only load after you accept cookies or log in, so the real list can be longer.
- We visited from a server in the United States. Sites load different trackers and cookie banners in different countries (visitors in the EU usually get a consent banner first).
- This text was written from fixed templates because no AI writer was available. It uses exactly the same evidence.
Facts, not judgements: this page describes what the code and traffic show, not anyone's intent. Not financial advice. Case id 0JoH9Kju.